on 06-28-2012 7:55 AM
Dear All,
We have problem in VAT and Surcharge Calculation in case of Dealer Invoice.
During creation of purchase order, the customer is not aware actual CENVAT amount as well as VAT/CST. Hence, creates a PO with dummy tax code.
While posting MIGO, the user manually updates the excise amount which is calculated based on basic price confirmed by the dealer.
While posting MIRO by using a valid tax code, system is posting all the excise amounts correctly but VAT and Surcharge are incorrect.
The customer has tried to manually adjust the tax amount by removing the "Calculate Tax" check box but gets the error message “the tax amount must not be greater than the tax base".
We find that, VAT calculation does not consider the manually posted excise values. Instead the VAT amount gets calculated based on the percentages maintained in condition records.
Subsequently, the surcharge gets calculated on VAT amount including the difference of actual CENVAT amount and the Manually posted CENVAT.
Test Example:
| MANUAL Entry in MIGO/J1IEX (INR) | % | ACTUAL CENVAT Calculation by SAP | % | Difference |
Material value | 55630 | 55630 | |||
BED | 7582.8 | 6675.6 | 12% | 907.20 | |
SEC | 151.66 | 2% | 133.5 | 2% | 18.15 |
EC | 75.83 | 1% | 66.8 | 1% | 9.07 |
Total Amount | 63440.29 | 62505.9 | 934.42 | ||
VAT | 2537.6* | 4% | 2500.23 | 4% | |
Surcharge | 126.9* | 5% | 171.73 | 5% |
(*- as required) (eg: VAT 2500.23 = 4% of 62505.9 and Surcharge 171.73 = (2500.23+934.42)*5%)
What could be the reason and how can this be corrected?
Thanks,
Vinod P
which version you are on and what tax procedure you are using , if your implementation is older then 2 years , please check for program error SAP notes on sap support site. In past couple of years SAP has release tons of program corrections and improvements.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Vinod,
First check "GR Based IV" indicator in PO. It must be activated in case of "Dealer" PO.
Second, go to, SPRO - Logistics General - Tax on goods movements - India - Basic Settings - Determination of excise duty - Condition based excise determination - Classify condition types
Here maintain the CST and VAT condition type as below,
TAXINN - JVRD - RMDAPVAT A/P VAT RM Deductible
TAXINN - JVCS - CSTAPND A/P CST Non Deductible
TAXINN - Surcharge condition type - APLST A/P Local Sales tax
Also, in dealer case, maintain JMOP (BED) condition type percentage as "zero" and Ecess, SEcess condition percentages as 2% and 1% respectively. Ensure you have to maintain the "Set-off" condition types with percentage as 100% in the tax code.
After maintaining all these, check the scenario again.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.