on 06-26-2012 10:55 AM
HI SD Members,
In Transportation process
Requirement-G/R to be created first, without G/R user should not be able to create shipment cost document.
document flow=
1-STO- from plant to plant
2-replenishment delivery
3-After Post goods issue the inventory accounting document generates
4-Shipment document
5-G/R (goods receipt)
Shipment document flow=
1-Shipment document
2-Shipment cost
3-Service acceptance
4-Invoice receipt
at present scenario- user can create shipment cost before doing G/R at receiving plant.
To avoid confusions in accounting user wants G/R to be created first, without G/R user should not be able to create shipment cost document.
Any suggestions where to change the settings.
Regards,
JD
Hello Venugopal,
Its little confusing, For me above logic looks fine. Why you want to restrict the system for creating shipment cost doc before G/R(receiving Plant).
As i understood from above post,
1-STO created by Rec.Plant
2- Replenishment delivery created in Supplying Plant
3- PGI is done
4- Shipment document created in Supp.Plant
5. Shipment cost document
6. MIGO-G/R in Receiving Plant
This is as per design & business also works in same way. Why do you want to do step-6 first n then step-5 later? what could be the reason.
If still you want to restrict,then you can follow either of one option below:-
1. During shipment cost document creation wrt:Shipment doc- you will be knowing replenishment del doc no. Create dummy output type-trigger this output only when an Inbound delivery/GR for STO exists. Then refer this output in NAST, whether output is triggered for this delivery or not. If triggered allow system to create shipment cost document else stop processing further.
2. Back track the GR qtty of the respective material from shipment document- Delivery doc- STO document & restrict the shipment cost doc creation.
I dont see any std solution for this. You may need to go for development.
NOTE: There are many other factors you need to consider. in STO there could be "n" no.of materials, but delivery might be created for few items. in Shipment document may consists multiple deliveries for which you are trying to create shipment cost, but some of the line items GR might be done for some dont. So all these factors need to consider.
Regards,
Reazuddin MD
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Reazuddin,
For the valuable suggestion, You are correct,as per standard procedure.
But The reason for planing this process in this business =
The thing is that the Shipment cost accounting document getting generated.before the goods reach at reciving plant.
This is what needs to change.
Thanks for the reply
Regards
JD
Hi JD,
Just to remind you that the cost in the Shipment cost document is nothing but freight cost, it doesnt contain product cost. As per your below points, it resembles that you are treating it as material cost.
- Yes, In std its not available as i said in my earlier post. You have to go for with enhancement.
Once PGI is done in replenishment delivery, accounting entries booked in receiving plant & stock will be reduced from Supplying Plant, whether goods physically received or not.
- This cost you are referring is actual frieght/transport cost. Whether goods damaged or not. Business is liable to pay transport cost. (damage or goods not received such complaints deals in diff way).
With the help of exit during shipment cost creation- you have to derive the logic or educate the system about Goods arrival at receiving plant & can add piece of coding to enact how system has to behave.
Regards,
Reazuddin MD
Dear Reazuddin MD
Thanks for your effort,
1=Freight cost and material cost both are different. - CORRECT !
2=Freight cost -Whether goods damaged or not. Business is liable to pay transport cost.-CORRECT !
3=Material cost-Once PGI is done in replenishment delivery, accounting entries booked in receiving plant & stock will be reduced from Supplying Plant, whether goods physically received or not.- CORRECT !
Hence Resolved.
Thanks for the Clarity
Regards,
JD
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.