cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Same SO number from 2 ecc systems to APO system

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All,

We are working in scenario where 2 ECC systems are connected to 1 APO system. Both the ECC systems are defined as separate business system group in APO.

My query is:

For the transaction data such as Sales orders, planned orders, production order etc.. will there be any problem if try to bring same SO number(or any other transaction object) from 2 ECC systems to the APO system? Will it create any conflict?

Example:

ECC 1          SO    1234     Material x

ECC 2          SO     1234     Material y

The same query is applicable for all other transaction data.

regards,

Mohit

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Mohit,

For the ease of planning and understanding for users and the system it is better to have a user exit which will add a prefix on every order coming in to apo.

For eg:

ECC 1          SO    1234     Material x

ECC 2          SO     1234     Material y

when orders are coming from ECC 2, the user exit can add a prefix 2-1234, by this way there will be a clarity.

Thanks

Venkat

rajkj
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Mohit,

As APO maintains GUID rather than just order number, theoretically it's possible to use same order number but different sources. However, the possible conflict, I can think of using /SAPAPO/RLCDEL t.code by order number. This t.code is very useful to delete the transactional data but does not provide another filter to recognize the source system.

Thanks,
Rajesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Rajesh,

In the additional Selection options options of this report there is fields 'location' . Probably we can use this field to restrict the data that need to be deleted.

Your comments on this?

regards,

Mohit

rajkj
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Mohit,

Deleting the transactional data by order number option does not allow you to specify any other filter. The order number itself is a very detailed level information. Pl check the t.code execution.

Thanks,

Rajesh