05-14-2012 10:46 AM
Hi Experts,
RHAUTUPD_NEW program executed to remove/add indirect role assignment made to position via transaction PFUD. However, recociliation made does not reflected in SU01. What might be the reason of this isolated case as it works for others - appreciate if you could shed some lights here in order for me to further investigate.
Furthermore, appreciate if someone could confirm which date is reflected as 'Valid From' column in SU01 (Roles Tab) - as far as I understand, it should be referring to start date of the relationship between Object S - P/AG. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Best Regards.
05-14-2012 11:32 AM
Hi,
Use report RHPROFL0 with proper evaluation path to reconcile roles assigned to position of users.
Furthermore, appreciate if someone could confirm which date is reflected as 'Valid From' column in SU01 (Roles Tab) - as far as I understand, it should be referring to start date of the relationship between Object S - P/AG. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
In your case, yes! the 'valid from' field contains the start date of OM relationship created between S and AG.
For RHAUTUPD_NEW to reconcile indirect role assignment, the swtich HR_ORG_ACTIVE must be set to YES in table PRGN_CUST. Also the IT0105 subtype 0001 record of the user should be correct & in validity period. Please check.
Thanks
Sandipan
Message was edited by: Sandipan Choudhury
05-14-2012 11:32 AM
Hi,
Use report RHPROFL0 with proper evaluation path to reconcile roles assigned to position of users.
Furthermore, appreciate if someone could confirm which date is reflected as 'Valid From' column in SU01 (Roles Tab) - as far as I understand, it should be referring to start date of the relationship between Object S - P/AG. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
In your case, yes! the 'valid from' field contains the start date of OM relationship created between S and AG.
For RHAUTUPD_NEW to reconcile indirect role assignment, the swtich HR_ORG_ACTIVE must be set to YES in table PRGN_CUST. Also the IT0105 subtype 0001 record of the user should be correct & in validity period. Please check.
Thanks
Sandipan
Message was edited by: Sandipan Choudhury
05-23-2012 9:50 AM
Dear Sandipan,
First of all, thanks you for your input.
I would say this is isolated case and only happened to specific ID. Additional to that, I notice 'Organizational Mgt' button in SU01 is red and when I try to reconcile, error message that I received is 'ID xxxxx does not exist'.
FYI, data team will update IT0105/ST0001 upfont upon creating hiring record. The ID will only be created upon request. The reason behind it, we want it to be linked automatically and user can use their ID once the ID created. Appreciate if you could shed some lights and correct me if I'm wrong.
Best Regards.
05-14-2012 12:56 PM
Hi,
if you use a CUA (central user administration), please pay attention to note 1605280, as there is a known issue with HR-Org. assignements.....
b.rgds, Bernhard
05-23-2012 10:04 AM
Dear Bernhard,
Thanks for sharing but we does not implement CUA - based on my recent update, appreciate if you could shed some lights.
Best Regards.