on 05-08-2012 3:57 PM
hello everybody,
i'm working with PI 7.1
I have a interface file to Idoc (1 to many) that generate many idocs.
We have a big performance problems and i tried to unse the IDoc Message Packages using transaction IDXPW.
But this way not worked
when i process a message , the idocs don't go out and stay on PI. And i don't see any package.
How work this method?
how can i find the message ID? i need do this procedure for packaging messages every time? is not possible have a authomatic procedure?
i'm really confused.
I follow these links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/99/2653429392ab53e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://scn.sap.com/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/09/xiidoc-message-packages
thanks for any suggestions
Alex
hi michael,
thanks for answer.
I already used your suggestion At the moment we are mapping one inbound messages in o-unbounded idoc.
The problem in in SAP. when i have 1000 idoc, they are processed just 5 on same time (dialog process). So i need wait 1 our.
I read PI 7.1 tuning guide and they suggest to use outbound message package.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
other suggestions?
i read this document:
on page 18 i read this:
You can collect IDocs in the Integration Engine outbound, and send to a receiver as a package, calling transaction code IDXPW. ...
....
...
This saves system resource, and reduces overhead caused by setting up RFC
connections.
but seem don't work
Hi,
>>>when i process a message , the idocs don't go out and stay on PI. And i don't see any package.
How work this method?
don't use IDXPW
just use the mapping to map from one file to many IDOCs (change IDOC occurance as per my blog)
and send many IDOCs in one tRFC call (it will happen automatically once you map to many idocs with changed occurance) - this is the nicer way
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.