on 03-29-2012 10:57 AM
Hi all,
I am working on a scenario where SAP ECC needs to query some database via PI.
I have created a sync proxy - which calls the interface on PI, the request is send and then via JDBC I perform the SELECT statement and now I want to capture the response. I used the request response bean and all other configuration. Still I am getting an error:
No sender agreement configured that matches the message's header fields (sender
party: "", sender service: "DEV_DB_SYSTEM", interface: "http://test.com/db_select
LocationID_In", receiver party: "", receiver service: "DEV_ECC")
I have read the blogs about the request/ response bean and the config of that is ok. I checked if there is a sender agreement for above error and this is also the case. Someone else some idea's?
I also tried to look for example blogs for request/ response bean on JDBC adapter but alot of links seems to be broken?
Thanks
why are you using request response bean.. receiver JDBC supports sync communication and your sender proxy also...so create a simple sync scenario
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
You don't have to use RequestResponseBean for this purpose. It is only designed for special sort of sync scenarios that use typical non-sync adapters (i.e. file adapter), so for instance for file-RFC-file scenarios.
In your case, what you need to do is to create a synchronous service interface for Proxy, that will include request message and response message, then implement the proxy client in ECC, prepare separate mappings for request and response, and so on. Have a look at a similar thread here: http://scn.sap.com/thread/1837208.
Hope this helps,
Greg
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
use a sync JDBC in your scenario and thus avoid all the beans
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.