Vitria (vs) SAP XI

[Former Member]

Hi all ,

Here i need some justifications to use <b>SAP XI instead</b> <b>Vitria </b> in my company.

Vitria acts as central integration hub to connect SAP and other non-SAP

systems. The integration is for both inbound and outbound to each system or

spoke.

some issues i need to clarify are:

1) Vitria has the clustering capability for handling load and handles

30 milion transactions / day - For a single business case.(we have currently

around 10 such business cases).

2) Vitria creates a business object for each transaction and persists

its state. It logs complete journey of the object which may run through 2 or

3 systems in the attached diagram.

3) Vitria has rich BPM carpet and we can represent high-level to

low-level business cases in the form of business process graphic.

(combination of States and Transitions). We are allowed to do

anything in each state/transition with conditions/event filters/data

filters..etc.

i will appriciate your views on it.

Thanks in advance

Ramesh.

[udo_martens · Accepted solution]

Hi Ramesh,

1) 300 million transactions / day shouldnt be a problem 4 XI

2) Logging of messages / trace can be switched on / off

3) XI-BPM can handle your task, but could have a performance problem in your case

Regards,

Udo

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Regarding persistence SAP-XI has excellent data persistence after each major step in a series of action which we call 'SAP-XI pipeline'

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/41/b714f85ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm

In case of BPM , the strength of SAP-XI lies in

Its support to BPEL4WS. (Business Process Language for Web Service).That means you can easily export and import BPM model for resuse.

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/9f/7a7440036f6d1de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

Regards

Bipin Joshi