cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Urgent - Workflow (WF14000133)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello

We use SRM Server5.5(Classic scenario)

We implemented BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI for WF14000133

But agent is not assgined. When i check the workflow log using swi1, there is no agent. System show the message " all users can process this task", when i click the agent button.

And all users received the work item, even if they are not correct approver.

I found a lot of notes to solve this problem.

923463 BAdI n-step approval - Container inconsistent for 1st step

901068 BAdI Workflows: Enhancement of Note 896556

898768 BADI Workflow: Determining current approvers

909871 Error in BAdI workflow without approval

903015 BAdI Workflows: Events and parallel steps

894978 APPROVERLIST container element has incorrect approver status

870391 Programming for the BAdI workflow

910612

784408 Item approval: Rejected items in BADI

We have SRM server 5.5 and SP07.

Should i apply these notes? Or is there any solution?

Next week, we will take the 1st integration test.

Could you give me a solution or tip?

Thank you

Best Regards

SH

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

We are applying the same Badi in our system. What i know that in the tcode OOCU assign agent part from the attributrs button you can change from Generel Task to non general task and than you can add agents. However, in my case it is still a general task and the approvers are determined correctly from the Badi.

Maybe changing this would help.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi So Hee Lee,

If the shoe fits! I'd most certainly apply the notes to the test system if they are applicable and match the problem description. I'd also test with the standard BADI before i go editing it. As your on such a high prod/support pack level, shouldnt these notes already be in the system??

Just make sure that your rules are correct. Check with help.sap.com

Hope this helps,

w

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thank you

More haste, less speed, as the saying goes.

So I and my developer were looking for the solution staidly.

We found the reason of error.

Thank you

Best Regards

SH