cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Message Splitting conditionally

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi all,

I am doing 1 : n multimapping,with two receivers.

I have a field in the source based on which am splitting the messages to either of the two receivers.( in mapping)

In the moni am gettting and error -

SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND</SAP:Code>

First of all I am not sure whether such a scenario is possible or not.

Does multimapping imply tht we cannot split a message based

on a condition to two or more receivers??

Thanks

Priyanka

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

bhavesh_kantilal
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

You can do this using <u><i>Conditional Receiver Determination</i></u>

In your receiver determination, you can add multiple receivers and then provide conditions in the condition field on which the receiver will be shoosen.

No need for 1:N mapping.

Regards,

Bhavesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks for the replies guys.

I know thats its possible with two separate mapping but basically I wanted to

check out whether we can do a multimapping (using Enhanced Interface determination) and split messages conditionallly.

bhavesh_kantilal
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

This should be done using conditional receiver determination. In your receiver determinatio, you can add multiple receivers and then give the condition against the Condition field of the Receiver Determination.

You will have separate mapping for each of these cases.

Regards,

Bhavesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

So you are saying that splitting based on a conditon(using enhanced interface determination) will not work out.

Priyanka

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hey Priyanka,

Bhavesh is correct.....

What he wants explain you is...

You have to go with Standard Receiver Determination only, but in that you have to choose multiple receivers and specify condition for each and every receiver in corresponding condition tab. Based on that condition that corresponding receiver is working... But need to do different mappings for also...

Cheers.,

S