on 03-05-2012 7:23 PM
Hello Experts,
We are trying to make a decision nto go in for integration of web application with sap .
Do we use the SAP dotnet connector or SAP XI, we already have sap xi in the landscape.
If we were to use sap xi, I understand there will be development from .net team to incorporate wsdl files, the pi team for development of interfaces and theabap team to get the rfc/s idocs/proxies .
If we use dot net connector we would only employ the dot net team.
Can you please suggest and provide some wikis or presentations that would help us to take a decision??
Thanks,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>Do we use the SAP dotnet connector or SAP XI, we already have sap xi in the landscape.
Go with SAP PI. This is a middleware tool and you create the design for the current and future. I have used SAP dot net connector similar to JCO for the application integration. This is hard to maintain.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ravindra,
There shouldn't be much development implementing a WSDL with .NET. The [WSDL.exe|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7h3ystb6%28v=vs.90%29.aspx] program will generate most of your boilerplate code for calling the web service. In my opinion it's better to use a web service instead of the .NET connector because it can easily be reused should you ever choose to replace/upgrade the website.
If you don't want to use PI, another option would be to use the[ Enterprise Services in ECC|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/47/310fc763fc2037e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm].
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I don't think that there is any specific presentation providing recommendation about this point.
>>If we use dot net connector we would only employ the dot net team
Some customization will be required on ECC end in this case as well.
It is logical to use PI as you already have PI as middleware in your landscape. Any point to point integration will remove need of development in PI. However, we still use PI for various reasons, like easy management, monitoring, loose coupling etc. Your decision is more about to do point to point vs use of middleware.
Regards,
Prateek Raj Srivastava
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.