I have a question regarding expense types. Should we create separate Expense types for "paid by company" and "reimburse to employee" or is there a way to use the same expense type to both "paid by company" and "reimburse to employee"? Ex: "Hotel - Company paid" and "Hotel-Reimburse to employee" should be separate expense types or can we achieve this with say one expense type "Hotel"?
No, please create a seperate Expense Type (ex. HOTL and HOTP) for paid by company and reimburse to the employee. This will create an inconsistency later on. Your statistic table for one will have an inconsistent results. I would not recommend to do this.
although what Muhammad suggested might work, technically, I still have to agree with Raynard. If you don't use separate expense types you will get problems at the latest when sending data to FI / connecting to HR / Posting runs concerning taxes.
Above persons are rights as well because at the time of expense definition (V_T706B1), you need to define whether expense is reimbursable to employee or paid by company.. Still it would be workable but would NOT correct total amount as reimbursable or paid by company in reports.
There might be other issue as well (i.e. Tax)
My solution can be worked if both are reimbursable or paid by company and with same tax or no tax..
Agreed, It is better to define expense types separately.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.