on 01-09-2012 7:07 PM
Hi:
We noticed that Contract ID (tech name: 0XSARAGID ) have different prefixing in Contract cube v/s Invoice cube?
Is there a technical reason behind it ? Or is it a bug?
How to/when to modify/change so the same field have same prefix in both dat models?
Thanks
Harin
Hi Harin,
This issue has been corrected with 2.1 SP07. Please reactivate the Invoice and contract transformation after applying SP07 and reload. That should give you consistent concatenation.
Regards,
Divyesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
13 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.