cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

For same material hoe to avoid and do QI to UR as well as qaulity trecodin

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Guys ,

I have a senario like for same materialagainst production order , i want to post the quality stock in QI stock and after result recording and quantity transfer to UR mvt 321. for same material some time i want to post direct UR avoide 321 mvt but Quality inspection and result recoding we want . kindly suggest the way how to do step by step .and what are the master data & config required to do ?

regards

s

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member221025
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Sush,

you can use "Early Inspection for a Goods receipt".

You have to activate inspection types 03 and 04 both in QM material Master.

once a process order is released , the system creates two inspection lots (inspection lot origins 03 and 04).

you can post a partial quantity to UR.

refer this very helpful link.

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/60/64cae6d9b311d1953a00a0c930e04c/content.htm

regards,

Amol

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi ,

Inspection plan is required for both inspection type ?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi you can difine the MICs (Control Indicator) as long tern characteristics so than when ever you want you can take the UD. But even after taking the UD you ll be able to do the result recording.

former_member221025
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Yes,

you will have to create Inspection plans for both.

i will suggest you to run a test cycle.

Regards,

Amol Manave

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thnx . i will try .

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi,

here i m suggest you to create new inspection type like Z04, where remove post to inspection stk indicator, and than create new inspection plan whith same usage "1", so whenever ur lot will be there, it's status is CRTD, when u goto QA02 for change lot details, system ask u for the Tasklist, so, whenever u want no stck select the seconf one and if you select the stck relevant than select the first one.

U need to check in ur testing server.

Regards

Former Member
0 Kudos

Can i able to create for same material different inspection plan.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

U can try collective UD , if u don't want to spend time in taking UD.

U can select those lots and do back ground UD

Former Member
0 Kudos

YES!

Regards

Former Member
0 Kudos

Very simple

for those materials you want Posing 321,Quality inspection and result recoding active "post to inspection" in 04 inspection type.

for material you ned only Quality inspection and result recoding we want do not active "post to inspection" in 04 inspection type.

this will post material to unrestricted.

Early inspection will not help in your case !

former_member221025
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Sush/ Sujit,

i think, requirement is for Same Material Only.

Sush wants both requiremnts for one material only.

Please Correct me if i am wrong.

Regards,

]

AMol

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yes ...its same material.

Then my solution will not help !!

Even early inspection will not help.

An user exit QAAT0001can be used in this case to avoid post stock in inspection but create inspection lot.

Its not simple ,you have to build the logic and vary some parameter like storage location while lot creation.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yes it is same material .

Example : 1

Matreail no : xyz

Ins typ : 4

IP : there

when GR stock go to QI and after RR and UD it was go to UR.

Example : 2

Matreail no : xyz

Ins typ : ?

IP : there

when GR stock go to after RR and UD UR directly

how i will do .pls suggest .

krishnamurty_madduri
Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

If i understood correctly: Your requirement is to inspect some times and No inspection some other times, for the same material.

The options are:

1. You can use DMR for skip lots

2. You can use manual inspection lot creation for those times when you don't want the GR to go in to QI Stock.

3. The third option of using a User exit would be complicated since you may have to build the logic into it (which would be rather difficult)

Pl. try and let us know. KrishnaM