Pricing Argentina

[Former Member]

Buen día.

Estoy customizando los impuestos para Argentina y no sé porque en el esquema estandard las condiciones estan "duplicadas" siendo una estadistica y la otra no.

Por ejemplo:

916 0 J1AP VAT Perception I

917 0 J1AQ VAT Perception II

918 0 J1A1 GI Perc. Region 1

919 0 J1X1 GI Perc. Region 1 II

920 0 J1A2 GI Perc. Region 2

921 0 J1X2 GI Perc. Region 2 II

Donde la primera es estadistica y la segunda no. Me gustaría entender porque esto es así.

Muchas gracias.

[eduardo_hinojosa]

Hi

Because in Argentina you use a rounding that doen't follow the standard rule for the group conditions in the pricing procedure RVAAAR. So, before calculate it in the standard rule and save it as an statistic condition, and after, recalculate it with the VOFM formula 333 with the algorithm for Argentina, taking the statistic condition as an input. Note 877829 and first coments in VOFM 333 tell the reasons.

In the future, try to write posts in English, everybody don't understand spanish and the solutions to legal requirements in Argentina are a good sample to solve other problems in pricing procedures.

Regards

Eduardo

EN ESPAÑOL

Hola

La razón es que utilizáis en Argentina un redondeo que no entra dentro del estándar. Por eso primero utiliza el estandard y la guarda como estadística y luego utiliza ese calculo para procesar el propio algoritmo utilizando la condición estadística como punto de partida. Mira la nota Note 877829 - Rounding for tax conditions.

916	0	J1AP	VAT Perception I	900	   		6
917	0	J1AQ	VAT Perception II	916	   	S		81	333		J1F
918	0	J1A1	GI percep.región 1	900	   		6
919	0	J1X1	GI Perc. Region 1 II	918	   	S		82	333		J1J
920	0	J1A2	GI percep.región 2	900	   		6
921	0	J1X2	GI Perc. Region 2 II	920	   	S		82	333		J1K

SI te fijas en la subrutina VOFM 333 (include FV64A333) tienes el siguiente texto

************************************************************************
*   Argentina:  Formula for VAT perceptions    step 2
*               and Gross income perceptions   step 2
*
*   This formula is the 'retrofit' version of formula 932 of releases
*     4.6C and lower. In addition, enhancements to read the reference
*     conditions and minimum amounts from customizing have been
*     incorporated here
*
*
*   Basic idea:
*
*    In case of VAT perception (J1AQ):
*          The full VAT perception is calculated in condition J1AP.
*          This formula applies partial exemptions    if present
*          the customer is subjected to via the tax category
*          associated with condition J1AP, ie. the previous condition
*          before calling this formula.
*          It is checked wether the document total value after
*          application of the exemption exceeds the lower limit
*          defined by the field 'lower_limit'.
*
*          In case of credit memos, the lower limit is deactivated if
*          the original document contains nonzero J1AQ values.
*
*   In case of Gross income perception (J1X1, J1X2, J1X3):
*         The full gross income perceptions are calculated in conditions
*         J1A1, J1A2 and J1A3.
*         This formula applies partial exemptions if present
*         the customer is subjected to via the tax category
*         associated with conditions J1A1, J1A2, J1A3
*         ie. always the previous condition before calling this formula.
*
*   In case of partial VAT exemption (J1AX):
*         This case is very seldom.
*         The full VAT is calculated in condition J1AX. This formula
*         applies if the VAT condition J1AU applies.
*
************************************************************************

En lo sucesivo intenta escribirlo en inglés, todo el mundo no conoce el español y las peculiaridades que usáis en Argentina son un buen punto de partida para resolver problemas en los esquemas de cálculo.

Un saludo

Eduardo

Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 3, 2011 4:04 PM

Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 3, 2011 4:13 PM

Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 3, 2011 5:04 PM

[Former Member]

Excelent E_Hinojosa. Your answer was very clear.

So now, I must charge in VK11 transaction records for both, J1AU and J1AX (for example) ?

Because at the moment I just charge info for J1AU condition and when I create a document (VA01) and see condition's tab, the amount is calculated, but but just in J1AU condition row. The value hasn't copied to J1AX condition. Then, the calculated tax value doesn't appears into TAX field at item screen header level. It field stay in zero. Why It happens ?

Was I clear ?

In advance, really thank you for your help !!!

[eduardo_hinojosa]

Hi,

Update the statistical condtions. One suggestion. You can update the conditions (see them in tcode V/06) with a access sequence (see it in tcode V/07 to know what tables work in VK11). This conditions determine the value for taxes in a first step. As these amounts don't fit with the rounding rule, then, it is recalculated in the other conditions with a formula VOFM (so, these conditions don't have values in VK11) with your legal algorithm that you can read with ABAP in VOFM 333 and others, taking the prior amount as a base amount.

Also, check if you have a requirement VOFM in V/08 in your pricing procedure (see Note 156230 - Requirements: What is permitted, what is not?).

For further information related with VAT in SD, see SAP Note 872449 - Tax determination in Sales and Distribution

I hope this helps you

Regards

Eduardo

Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 4, 2011 4:17 PM

[Former Member]

Realy thank you E_Hinojosa.

Your answer help me a lot.

Have a nice weekend.

[Former Member]

Hola,

La razón puede ser de tipo estadístico condición es utilizada por SAP para documentos específicos a la Argentina y los tipos normales de condición se utilizan para los desplazamientos a través de VF01.

Espero que esto ayude.

Saludos,

Sharan