on 11-01-2011 9:02 AM
Hi Experts:-
We have below requirement in GATP:-
Can we maintain a condition record for pick /pack time = 1 day against Shipping Point in particular Location.? In other word we would like to push schedule delivery date+1 day.
In APO we can see control data :- Plan (LEAD), load (LOAD), pick/pack (PICK), transport (TRAN), unload (UNLD)
In APO We have maintained value = 24:00 for location XXXX ( as per below steps)
1. In the SAP Easy Access screen choose Master Data ® Master Data for Transportation and Shipment Scheduling ® Create Scheduling Step.
2. Select a condition type.
3. Enter concrete values for the key combination.
4. Enter a duration (external display: hhhhhhh:mm).
While checking order, When the process branches into APO ATP, can see time 24:00 This seems to indicate that Pick/Pack record has now been found, but the scheduled delivery date is not being pushed out by one extra day.
Looking at the condition log in APO shows the following;;
Lead Plan:304 Access for Access sequence LEAD missing(Usage U)
Pick Pick : 208 Condition record has been found
Load Load: 304 Access for Access sequence LOAD missing(Usage U)
TRAN Transport: 009 Condition record is missing
UNLD Unload : 002 Access not made ( Initialized field)
Can you suggest.
Samir,
Pick-Pack time will only affect delivery date if the order is forced into forward scheduling. During backward scheduling, the Material Availability date will instead be forced backward in time.
You can review the schedules that are proposed. in R/3, VA02 > select item > perform availability check. On the Delivery proposal screen, review the proposed Material Availability date, remember this. Now select the scheduling Icon (usually the last one on the right, yellow). Here you will see the condition records that have been found. Now from this screen, select the dates Icon,. In the dates display, the Pick pack time will cause there to be a difference between Material Availability date (previous screen) and the Goods Issue date. Or, you can select the graphics Icon and see the whole schedule.
In the case of 24:00 for Picking, MAD should be offset from Goods Issue by one day. Since you are not using TRAN, then the GI date should equal the Delivery Date.
Make sure you have entered a valid shipping calendar in your Shipping Point.
Best Regards,
DB49
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Samir,
Well, this is contrary to your previous statement, where the log results implied that you were not determining a Transportation condition.
Anyway, no matter, back to picking. When you were checking, What was the MAD date? What was the Goods Issue Date/time that you saw when you clicked on the Dates button?
Best regards,
DB49
Hi DB,
I have added Transporation after your reply and tried again but it was not happending.
at present below are the dates
Delivery date D 04.11.2011
Goods issue date 03.11.2011
Loading date 03.11.2011
Material avail.date 02.11.2011
Transportation Plan. Date 03.11.2011
As tranporation duration is in route =3 days...with +24 hours effect we are expecting to get push to 7.11.2011 ( as Sat and Sunday holiday in calendar).
regards
Samir
Samir,
Whoa, lets settle one thing at a time. Your original question:
We have below requirement in GATP:-
Can we maintain a condition record for pick /pack time = 1 day against Shipping Point in particular Location.? In other word we would like to push schedule delivery date+1 day
You have successfully scheduled your order so as to include Picking time of one day. Evidence of this is found in your actual dates. .
Goods issue date 03.11.2011
Material avail.date 02.11.2011
There is a one day difference between these dates. This means the 'PICK' scheduling was successful.
Now you say you want the Delivery date to be pushed out. This will only happen when you invoke forward scheduling (e.g. scheduled Material Delivery Date is earlier than 'today'). If the proposed MAD is greater than today, then the requested delivery date can be achieved, and it will not be changed.
In your example, your MAD is November 2, based upon all scheduling you are doing. Here in the US, this is 'tomorrow'. Requested Delivery date is being met, no rescheduling of the delivery date is necessary.'
Now, you also mention Transportation. You say that the duration should be 3 days, but in your previous statement, you have shown that you entered 24:00 (hrs) as your TRAN condition. This is not 3 days. Change to 72:00 for your TRAN condition. FYI Route duration found in ERP is ignored.
Best Regards,
DB49
Samir,
Delivery date is generally determined in forward scheduling by several durations. I suggest you read online help about how shipment scheduling is done using the condition technique. The durations, and the dates that are affected, are detailed there in a nice little graphic.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/3a/92e217b3f54a5eae7a4ac8a99e5e87/frameset.htm
I say again that delivery date will only be affected when the system reverts to forward scheduling. For more info on this subject, refer to the ERP online help for an overview. This also contains a nice little graphic at the end so you can visualize forward scheduling. The SCM Condition technique works similarly, except all scheduling and all dates are calculated in SCM using SCM condition data..
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/dd/5607e7545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
Best Regards,
DB49
Hi DB,
Thanks, Very helpful links.
I did some testing on various sets of data change in APO for PICK and TRAN :-
Parameters :-
Order creation date 2-Nov
Route YR0004= 4 days
Calendar :-Sat and Sun holidays & 11th Nov bank holiday
Test 1 with 0 Day pick time, No TRAN maintained :-
Delivery date 8-Nov
Gi Date 7-Nov
Loading date 7-Nov
MAD 7-Nov
Transportation planning date 7-Nov
Test 2 with 1 day pick time, No TRAN maintained :-
Delivery date 8-Nov
Gi Date 7-Nov
Loading date 7-Nov
MAD 4-Nov
Transportation planning date 7-Nov
Test 3 with 3 day pick time, No TRAN maintained :-
Delivery date 8-Nov
Gi Date 7-Nov
Loading date 7-Nov
MAD 2-Nov
Transportation planning date 7-Nov
Test 3 with 5 day pick time, No TRAN maintained :-
Delivery date 9-Nov
Gi Date 9-Nov
Loading date 9-Nov
MAD 2-Nov
Transportation planning date 9-Nov
-
Now next scenario only TRAN without PICK
Test1 with 1 day TRAN time
Delivery date 8-Nov
Gi Date 4-Nov
Loading date 4-Nov
MAD 4-Nov
Transportation planning date 4-Nov
*with 2 day and 3 day result is same as test1
Test2 with 4 day TRAN time
Delivery date 8-Nov
Gi Date 3-Nov
Loading date 3-Nov
MAD 3-Nov
Trasnportation planning date 3-Nov
Test3 with 7 day TRAN time
Can see Delivery Date moving ahead one day.
Delivery date 9-Nov
Gi Date 2-Nov
Loading date 2-Nov
MAD 2-Nov
Trasnportation planning date 2-Nov
-
Now next scenario is to maintain data in both PICK and TRAN
Test 1 with 1 days pick time+ 1 day Tran
Delivery date 8-Nov
Gi Date 4-Nov
Loading date 4-Nov
MAD 3-Nov
Transportation planning date 4-Nov
Test 2 with 1 days pick time+ 6 day Tran
Delivery date 9-Nov
Gi Date 3-Nov
Loading date 3-Nov
MAD 2-Nov
Trasnportation planning date 3-Nov
Would like to know is this the correct standard behaviour or something wrong with our system config.
regards
Samir
Edited by: Samir Ali on Nov 3, 2011 4:07 PM
Samir,
Would like to know is this the correct standard behavior or something wrong with our system config.
I don't have enough information to answer that question. Regardless, in the end, 'right' and 'wrong' ultimately is a function of whether the solution meets the Business requirements.
I will say that it appears that your transportation scheduling by "Condition Technique" is turned on and is working in your system.
Whether this meets your business requirements is another story. Do not expect me to sit and analyze all of your test scenarios, there are a host of factors that can affect delivery/transportation scheduling, and the management of date issues between R/3 and APO. For a start, make sure that you consult all of the notes attached to https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/547941 and https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/382746
If after reading all the relevant documentation, you are unable to arrive at a satisfactory solution for a specific Business problem, please let me know what the business problem is, and I may be able to offer a suggestion as to how to approach.
Best Regards,
DB49
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.