on 08-30-2006 7:43 AM
Hi ,
I am reading number of records from database and I want to send each record as IDOC to sap in a loop .
Can you please help me .
Thanks & regards,
Suvarna
Hi,
You do not need BPM for this.
You can do IDOC packaging. Check note : 814393.
Regards,
Bhavesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
Check this link for reference....
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/12/22/file-to-multiple-idocs-xslt-mapping
Sekhar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Check this thread as well might be help ful
Also look at Enhanced mapping without BPM
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Thanks,
Prakash
Thanks for the reply .
I did multimapping with BPM . But in BPM i used send step in loop. When I tried to select interface for send step it did not allow me to select index for the message .
Because of this i guess the same idoc in sent many times .
Can anyone tell me why I am not able to see the index ?
Thanks ,
Suvarna
Hi,
Maybe You don't have multiline variable. Why not to use forEach in the block?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f6/e1283f2bbad036e10000000a114084/content.htm
regards,
wojtek
Hi,
Here is an example of what you are trying to do:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/11/13283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/content.htm
Regards
Vijaya
Hi,
If you have multiple lines in your message from database and you would like to have many IDOC(s) from it at once you have to use BPM. Because IDOC adapter is on ABAP stack. If you want to avoid BPM in your case you should read record by record from database.
regards,
wojtek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
79 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.