on 10-13-2011 11:07 AM
Hi,
For a flow "ext (file) -> PI -> ECC (workflow)", from PI, I need to run / execute / trigger () a workflow step in ECC, which already exist. I think that I can acheive this by creating an abap proxy in ECC in which I will call a Bapi or Method to run / execute / trigger () this workflow step. I don't know exactly how for the moment (in parallel I'm doing search about it), but that's not the matter.
before to waste time by searching in this way, what's the best solution to call an ECC workflow step from PI ?
Many thanks.
Mickael
(*) maybe I don't use the good terminology. Sorry.
it does seem that triggering a workflow can be done by invoking a custom coded RFC or utilizing a ABAP proxy call.
I think it is only a matter of how comfortable you would be. Personally, i think the ABAP proxy way sounds appropriate.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi Shabarish,
I'm confortable with web service, IDoc, RFC/bapi and abap proxy (and ...), but here, I prefer to use abap proxy (asynch + sxmb_moni in ecc) except if there is another better approach
else as in PI we have ccBPM, so a workflow , as in ECC we have also workflow , does my approach (abap proxy & call method) is the good one ? or is there a better way between these two workflow tools: PI + ECC ? like a standard "workflow module" or a workflow "connexion" ? (I fear I know the answer but I would prefer to be sure),
Note: I'm in PI 7.11 SP06 and ECC 6.0.
Regards.
Mickael
> before to waste time by searching in this way, what's the best solution to call an ECC workflow step from PI ?
IMHO, Proxy is the best and elegant solution to GO.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.