BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE Always Asking Attributes

[Former Member]

Hello Experts,

Perhaps this is a very basic problem related to attributes, so my id as a OP_PURCHASER can't create shopping cart and returned error:

The attributes of the user are inconsistent or not defined. See transaction PPOMA_BBP.

I've checked using BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE and these are some of the messages:

Application "Shopping Cart": Define the attribute SYS

Application "Shopping Cart": Define the attribute PRCAT

Application "Shopping Cart": Define the attribute WRK

Application "Sourcing": Define the attribute CUR

Application 'Sourcing': Assign purchaser PURCHSLSBC01 to a purchasing group

Application 'Sourcing': Assign purchaser PURCHSLSBC01 to a purchasing organization

The strange part is I've maintained the attribute at the root level and inherited to the purchaser and BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE keep asking me to complete those attributes. Why?

Then I go to BBP_ATTR_CHECK, checking my user id and everything's OK (green result)

Is there something missing with my attributes? Fyi, I can create SC and PO with MANAGER role

Thank you for all the reply, appreciate it

[ricardo_cavedini]

Hello,

It is possible that an inconsistency has been created in your user. Business partner relationship is a bit complex in SRM, because many tables are linked.

You can try to perform the following steps:

- Go to PPOMA_BBP and select user in question;

- Drag and drop such user to another organization unit and save it;

- Select the same user and drag and drop to the original organization unit and save it.

- Try to create a document with this user.

Sometimes, moving user among organizations will update the BP relationships.

Regards,

Ricardo

[Former Member]

Thanks Ricardo for the reply, but I still got the same error

Somehow I used that too if a user-organization unit link is error or just delete it and create the new one.

Also, I've created new user with the same role and still error.

The problem solved when I assign this user more EBP roles like MANAGER, EMPLOYEE etc but of course this is inappropriate.

Regards,

Ted

Edited by: lastlegion on Oct 10, 2011 6:35 AM