ABAP Proxy without SOAP adapter in PI7.3

[Former Member]

Hi All,

We have dual stack implementation of PI7.3 but we do not wish to use the SOAP adapter for configuring an ABAP proxy scenario.

Is this possible? Is the Javastack only configuration in NW Admin available for use in dual stack implementation also?

Thanks and Regards,

Diptee

[baskar_gopalakrishnan2]

>Is this possible?

Yes it is possible to use proxy communication without using soap adapter. Since you have dual implementation , you can go for regular or classical IE processing. You can monitor using pipeline steps as normal.

[Former Member]

Thanks for the reply,

But do we have any option so that we need not rely on the ABAP stack?

Regards,

Diptee

Edited by: diptee s on Sep 21, 2011 2:55 PM

[vadimklimov]

Hello Diptee,

Yes, PI 7.3 has an option to run Java-only scenarios involving proxy communication: please consider usage of Integrated Configuration Objects together with XI over SOAP (XI message protocol available in SOAP adapter). In this case, PI's Advanced Adapter Engine is used and usage of ABAP stack is avoided in dual-stack installations.

Please also note that Integrated Configuration based scenarios have some limitations comparing to "classical" dual-stack based scenarios so that not all requirements that can be fulfilled in dual-stack scenarios are currently capable of being implemented via Integrated Configuration.

Regards,

Vadim

[baskar_gopalakrishnan2]

You can install java only stack or both java and abap stack as that of 7.1. So if you install dual stack (both java and abap) then you dont need to use AAE for the proxy adapter using soap. You can still use Proxy adapter XI for the proxy communication. Hope that helps.

[Former Member]

Hi All,

So it essetially means that only the below 2 options are available for ABAP proxy scenarios in PI7.3 for a ABAP+Javastack installation

- use of SOAP adapter over XI protocol

- use of conventional proxy configuration of the ABAP Integration Server

And the only Javastack config cannot be used for a dual stack implementation.

Please confirm if above is correct.

Regards,

Diptee

Edited by: diptee s on Sep 21, 2011 4:48 PM

[baskar_gopalakrishnan2]

Yes you are correct.

[Former Member]

Thanks Baskar!