08-24-2006 3:49 PM
All,
I have a request from our PM workstream team to determine if the release icon in transaction code ML81N can be "inactiviated" via security. I ran a trace when the transaction was being executed to view the relevant objects and field values being checked. The activities in the auth objects do not control the release activity.
Can anyone confirm that if they are using ML81N, they either need to have a release strategy (with release codes, which CAN be secured on) and that it can NOT be done via security?
Thanks,
08-25-2006 1:23 AM
08-25-2006 1:23 AM
08-25-2006 9:24 AM
Maybe defining a transaction variant could be a useful approach. The users would then have to use the (new) variant transaction instead of ML81N (=> requires to adjust their authorizations/roles: S_TCODE authorization regarding ML81N => the new TCODE).
08-27-2006 11:03 PM
Hi,
Just wanted to update - this authorization will be implemented along with the release strategy; so the combination of the two will allow users to release the service entry sheets with their delegation of authority (release code is an auth field that can be secured).
11-16-2009 8:09 PM
Hi, you know... I could'nt find it.
But, it could be possible..if there are any of the following exits have to be activated, arent?
INTERFAC
SRVDET
SRVEDIT
SRVENTRY
SRVESI
SRVESKN
SRVESLL
SRVESSR
SRVEUSCR
SRVKNTTP
SRVLIMIT
SRVMAIL1
SRVMSTLV
SRVPOWEB
SRVQUOT
SRVREL
SRVSEL
SRV_FRM
JUst I ve activated SRVREL...
Tks,
Ignacio
11-16-2009 10:08 PM
> ... you know... I could'nt find it.
I don't think you will find Julie this way either. The post is from 2006....
Cheers,
Julius