authorization issue after the Support packs upgrade

[former_member395983]

We're having problem on authorization issue after the SP upgrade.

One issue if "You are not authorized to call up line item display" using FCH1 and FS10N tcodes.

And the SU53 showing problem on S_TCODE FAGLL03.

How are we going to solve this issue? We dont want to add this missing auth object on all our finance roles.

Thank you in advance.

[arpan_paik]

SU53 seems to be mischievous. What does ST01 tells you?

Regards,

Arpan Paik

[former_member395983]

Hi Arpan,

Thanks for your reply..How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address?

[arpan_paik]

 How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address? 

If I were you, I won't do that. Did you not ever sign some confidentiality agreement? I wonder.

Anyhoo... (copy right @ David)

What are the objects been caught in category RC=4, RC=12?

Relate them with functional aspect of the transaction (error screen)

Edited : You can paste RC=4, RC=12 objects here without customer specific value if you want to.

Regards,

Arpan Paik

Edited by: P Arpan on Aug 23, 2011 2:36 PM

[former_member395983]

Thanks for informing me.

Here is the part of the trace where i can see RC=4.

16:18:04:838|AUTH | - - - |S_TCODE RC=4 |TCD=FAGLL03;

16:18:04:839|CMOD | - - - |rstscb_call_back|Parameter:

16:18:04:839|CMOD | 4 |rstscb_call_back|Parameter:Comment:Returncode: 0

16:18:04:844|CMOD | - - - |rstscb_call_back|Parameter:

Still tcode FAGLL03, same as the SU53.

Thanks.

[arpan_paik]

Assuming the trace is correct and [reading|http://sapficoconsultant.com/pdf/FAGLL03%20-%20DisplayChange%20Items_New.pdf] about the transaction FAGLL03 it seems somewhat logical for line item display. So it may be neccesary. Try consult functional guys before that.

Regards,

Arpan Paik

[former_member395983]

thanks for all your advise. I will consult it to our Finance consultant/analyst.