08-22-2011 11:44 PM
Hi experts, please help:
MR Result rel-billing period:
-
Install. | Log. reg. | MR date | Equipment | Device | Reg. | RR | MR | UMR | Short Descript. |
G2074849 | 1001897703 | 24.05.2011 | 5000431771 | 46038330 | 2 | 01 | 5,200 | KW | Periodic Meter Reading |
G2074849 | 1001897703 | 10.05.2011 | 5000431771 | 46038330 | 2 | 21 | 0,000 | KW | Meter reading at billing-rel. inst. |
G2074849 | 1000447226 | 09.05.2011 | 5000422593 | 46038857 | 2 | 22 | 6,200 | KW | Meter reading at billing-rel. removal |
G2074849 | 1000447226 | 25.04.2011 | 5000422593 | 46038857 | 2 | 01 | 8,300 | KW | Periodic Meter Reading |
The register operand of watt has set the flag 'Demand per month', so I hope that DEMAND14 get the greatest value (6,2) and not the sum of the two demands (6,2 + 5,2 = 11,4), the latter is what is currently happening.
Thanks.
Regards,
David Ampuero
08-23-2011 3:16 AM
David:
That is standard functionality - to get the result you desire, you need to ensure that the replacement transaction transfers the logical register number from the first device to the second. If that is not done, then the demand will be added as you see.
regards,
bill.
08-23-2011 5:38 PM
Hi Bill:
thanks, but this is another case with the same scenario, but if is operating correctly here.
-
Billing-Relevant Meter-Reading Results
-
Installat. | Log. reg. | MR date | Equipment | Device | Reg. | RR | MR | UMR | Short Descript. |
G201097 | 1001897709 | 17.02.2011 | 5000452361 | 36040428 | 2 | 01 | 1,200 | KW | Periodic Meter Reading |
G201097 | 1001897709 | 29.01.2011 | 5000452361 | 36040428 | 2 | 21 | 0,000 | KW | Meter reading at billing-rel. inst. |
G201097 | 1001791198 | 28.01.2011 | 5003359202 | 36142615 | 2 | 22 | 1,020 | KW | Meter reading at billing-rel. removal |
G201097 | 1001791198 | 19.01.2011 | 5003359202 | 36142615 | 2 | 01 | 1,197 | KW | Periodic Meter Reading |
After having debugged the function ISU_DEMAND_PROLONG i think that the problem in my first case is that the MR at billing-rel. removal (05.09.2011) has the same month of "Meter reading allocation date" (EABL-ZUORDDAT) that Periodic Meter Reading (05.24.2011), which is: "2011.05".
then, how i do in these cases to get just the peak between Meter reading at billing-rel. removal (05.09.2011) and Periodic Meter Reading (05.24.2011)?
Thanks.
Regards,
David Ampuero
08-24-2011 1:32 PM
As i alluded to in my response, check your logical registers for each device. The demand will be added unless the values are the same.
08-24-2011 2:52 PM
But how I can get that to executed the replace of device, the numerator of demand maintain the same logical register number?.
Thanks,
David
08-24-2011 3:49 PM
In the replacement transaction this is enabled. also have you tried EG60?
08-24-2011 7:54 PM
I execute EG60 and then click "Create proposal", the system assigns the same logical register numbers from device 46038857 to device 46038330, but when I save is displayed the following error:
******************************************************************************************************************************************************
The register specified does not exist in this period
Message no. EN414
Diagnosis
Register 001, device 46038330 does not exist over the entire processing period.
The problem is probably due to one of the following reasons:
The device has not been installed yet.
The device has already been removed.
The logical registers have been prorated.
Upon replacement, no register of the installed device assumed the task of the register from the removed device.
The logical register was prorated when it was maintained.
For more information, please refer to Restrictions for processing register relationships.
System Response
Processing is canceled.
Procedure
Specify a register that exists over the entire processing period.
******************************************************************************************************************************************************
Thanks.
Regards,
David