VAT & CST problem

[Former Member]

Hi All,

i am facing a problem in VAT and CST, i have configured every possible stuffs for this two condition type

following are the changes i made in the system

1. created two condition type JIVP & JIVC with access sequence JLST & JCST respectively with 368 & 367 tables in those assess sequence.

2. created two tax categories for india JIVC and JIVP.

3. created tax relevant for record for customer

JIVC 0 Tax exempted

JIVC 1 Normal (w/o Form)

JIVC c Normal ( With Form)

JIVP 0 Tax Exempted

JIVP 1 Liable for TAX

similarly for materia

JIVC 0 Tax Exepted

JIVC 1 Liable For Tax

JIVP 0 Tax Exempted

JIVP 1 Liable For Tax

4. Now for a customer in india to work for VAT 12.5% i maintaint the following setting in the master data of Customer and Material as follows

customer

JIVC 0 tax exempted

JIVP 1 Liable for tax

material

JIVC 1 Liable for Tax

JIVP 1 Liable for Tax

because this material will be used for both VAT & CST.

5. i maintained condition record for JIVP with the fist table (368) like as follows.

Country IN

Regoin of plant 13 ( maharastra)

Region of customer 13 ( maharastra)

Customer tax classification 1

Material tax classification 1

and record maintained is 12.5%

Now after maintaining every possible point when i started to creat a sales order with teh same set of customer and material i am not getting the condition type JIVP, when i went to analysis i found the following

JIVC condition record missing

Country IN

Regoin of plant 13

Region of customer 13

Customer tax classification 0

Material tax classification 1

JIVP condition record missing

Country IN

Regoin of plant 13

Region of customer 13

Customer tax classification 0

Material tax classification 1

Now my point is when i maintain only for JIVP why the same update is seen in both the condition type as every possible point is covered and had done some testing if i maintain both then both the record is showing in the order. even though i maintained different conditions still only the JIVC condition is taking. i am searching for that but didnt had clue.

so please any one can help me on this because i am stuck in some problem.

regards,

Subhro

[former_member188027 · Accepted solution]

Hi You will find only One condition type Either JIVC or JIVP and depending upon your Region

Check Tax Determination Rules :

SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -- Sales and Distribution -- Basic

Functions -- Taxes -- Define Tax Determination Rules

Customer taxes and Material Taxes

Condition table - IMG -> Sales & Distribution -> Basic Function -> Pricing Control -> Condition Type

Create the Condition Type ( JIVP and JIVC)

Condition class u2013 A

Calculation type-A

Manual entries u2013 D

Select u2013 Amount/Percentage, Item condition

Access Sequence- IMG -> Sales & Distribution -> Basic Function -> Pricing Control -> Access Sequence

Generally we take u2013 Country / Plant / Region / Tax. Class. Customer / Tax Class Material.

More ever u2013 Material , Sale Document , Sale Doc/Dist Channel /Price list, Contry/plant/region/material

Check Maintained P P:

SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -- Sales and Distribution -- Basic Functions

-- Pricing -- Pricing Control

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

I have checked in the system yes all the possible settings are made there condition type JIVP & JIVC will appeare according to the region. i have created this from a system which working fine with the same settings which i made. there is no difference.

i guess i should get the sellection JIVP (VAT) in the sales order as i have only made condtion record for JIVP then why in the analysis i find the that what every JIVC is having the same is appearing in JIVP.

Regards,

Subhrangshu

[Former Member]

THANKS FOR THE REPLIES

[former_member405182]

This message was moderated.

[former_member247302]

Hi

First define the TAX Determination rule in SPRO-SD-Basidfunction-TAX, here decide the sequence for CST and VAT.

For instance you make VAT as 1 and CST 2, then you have to use TAx classification 1 for VAT and Tax classification2 for CST,

Then create one more table where you will have tax classification 2cust/ tax claa2 mat which will be identical to JCST access sequence.

Now maintain the condition record for VAT using Taxclass1 access and for CST taxclss2.

Your issue will be resolved

[prasanna_kumar4]

Hi,

i maintained condition record for JIVP with the fist table (368) like as follows.

Country IN

Regoin of plant 13 ( maharastra)

Region of customer 13 ( maharastra)

Customer tax classification 1

Material tax classification 1

and record maintained is 12.5%

JIVC condition record missing

Country IN

Regoin of plant 13

Region of customer 13

Customer tax classification 0

Material tax classification 1

JIVP condition record missing

Country IN

Regoin of plant 13

Region of customer 13

Customer tax classification 0

Material tax classification 1

If You see above error system is picking the Customer Tax Classification wrong

Try to check once again the Access Sequence and also check whether initially have u created any condition record and also check with customer master and material master

Revert,

Regards,

Prasanna

[Former Member]

Hi Prasanna,

I have checked in the system, i have maintained only for JIVP Condition Record as this is a fresh testing so i started with JIVP . No other condition record are maintained. even i check if i change the master data of customer say if i change the customer Tax classification to 1 JIVC and then when we creat a sales order then JIVP is come nicely. After abservation i have realised that what ever changes i make in JIVC it is taking but the JIVP chnages are not working, that is interesting.

Do you any idea ?

regards,

Subhrangshu

[Former Member]

hi

You have to use

Customer tax classification 1

material tax classification 1 for your JIVC condition type and

Customer tax classification 2

Material tax classificatioon 2 for your another condition type.

Check this in your Condition table regarding the above fields .

May be you are using the same access sequence for the both condition types

regards

Prashanth