on 07-20-2011 6:26 PM
Hi All,
I came to a scenario where i need to pick the file from R/3 sys which of around 500MB and need to transport it to the Third party sys using PI 7.1 . This is just simply a pass through data i.e.., no mapping is required (no ESR). and i don't to make use of FCC or BPM
My question is can the File Adapter can pick the file which is of 500MB size?
If not then what would be best solution to do it?
Do i need to divide the file into smaller sizes say around 100MB a file each in R/3 sys and then pick those files .
can i do without dividing the files in the R/3 sys?
Thanks in advance.
Sai
Hi Sai,
Technically, PI can take any amount on the file, but it all depends on the hardware you are having on the system. So you should not have a problem with 500MB. Else you can see for other options like zipping the file and sending. Zip the file and see how big it is.
Regards,
---Satish
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Bhaskar,
If you zip probably the size would come less which may increase his performance a little. But I feel SAP also dont recommend this much load with PI.
If I am in his shoes then I will do a simple FTP without using PI itself. Else will look into other options. Thats my two cents.
Hope this alexs blog will give an idea to Sai:
/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2007/02/21/sap-xi-acting-as-a-huge-file-mover
Regards,
---Satish
Edited by: Satish Reddy on Jul 20, 2011 3:02 PM
Hi ,
If it is a only file transfer then use any FTP tool ........because transfering 500mb file through PI will be performance intensive.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Sai,
You can check options of BATCH SCRIPT, that needs to be called to move your 500 MB size file from ECC to third party. To get the batch scripts to work for 3rd party you need to check with your network team. You can schedue a btach job on ECC to run this script periodically. OR configure a sender file channel with option RUN OS Command before message processing, the channel polls for a file which does not exist on directory. Every poll of the channel triggers OS command and process if any files are found by batch script.
Cheers
Veera
Hi,
at one shot if you want process 500 MB then dont use PI try other options.
Alex solution feasible in your case, even if Zip the file i dont think the size will come down.
Regards,
Raj
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Sai,
Why can't you use PayloadZipBean in the module processor, that compresses the payload.
Ref: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/45/da9358a1772e97e10000000a155369/content.htm
Thanks,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sai,
>>My question is can the File Adapter can pick the file which is of 500MB size?
As one message it is not good idea, As you mentioned can break/chunk and send it. Have each broken message with tag (file name or in header ) so that you can figure out the sequence order. Yes you can do in ID alone with out ESR.
Cheers
Agasthuri
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
500 MB is a huge file to process. Though you dont involve mapping and no esr involved, still it might cause issue in performance.
Run it in the off peak schedule. TO use design interface without ESR , refer this [link|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/4383] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken];.
Hi Sai,
Processing 500MB file causes performance issues ..........my best suggestion is to process the data in chunks ...
If you process at a single shot it effects the other interfaces because of performance issues.....though you increase the tuning parameters in PI server...this is not a best practice...
Regards,
Naveen.
User | Count |
---|---|
94 | |
11 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.