on 06-15-2011 9:55 AM
Hi Gurus,
Is this possible?
1 Receiver Agreement, multiple Receiver Determinations
I can't create a new receiver agreement because the object already exists.
I can't see the receiver agreement that was created before in the new receiver determination that i created.
Hi,
Multiple Receiver determinations would mean multiple sender systems, in which case, corresponding to each sender receiver pair, there should be one receiver agreement.
Please check if the receiver agreement is locked in some other user's change list and not yet activated.
Regards
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
solved. thanks everyone! sorry for all the troubles
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Just as suggested, why dont u delete the Rcv Agreement and create a new one by "Create Specific".. Many time i have faced similar issues. .a simple way to save your time .. is just to delete it and recreate it ..
Kind Regards
KRishna
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I understand ur issue.....check for any unassigned receiver determinations under unassigned objects...sometimes somebody creates and forgets to assign it to config scenarios....if there is an existing receiver determination and you want to create a new one....use virtual receivers .....or else trace down the existing receiver determination either in unassigned objects or else it will be the change list if its deleted but not activated.....
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Did you check the Unassigned Objects Folder at the bottom of the list of scenarios to see if your object is there? If it is you can assign it to your scenario from there.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
You can check the receiver agreement in SXI_Cache. And also check if cache is properly updated.
I am assuming that you can not search the receiver agreement in ID.
Regards,
Harish
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
yes you can have one receiver agrement for multiple Receiver determinations..
let me explain one example.
Sender System File(BC_FILE) and receiver System SAP ECC.
suppose you have multiple secnerions between File System to SAP ECC,but mutiple scenarions sending data to ECC in the form of ORDERS IDoc, in this case you will crearte N number of receiver determinations but only one receiver agrement.
i hope i got you query correcttly.
Regards,
Raj
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HI,
Check in the "Receiver Determintion" page.in the bottom pane.. u would have options to expand and see what the Interface determination and Receiver Agreement u have created.. see if u have a proper Recceiver Agreement .there...
Regards,
Krishna
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>>1 Receiver Agreement, multiple Receiver Determinations
if you check in ID, there cannot be mulitple Receiver Determination objects for a single set of sender swcv, sender namespace and sender interface.
You can have multiple Recievers configured in the area "Configured Receivers" of the Receiver Determination objects.
thats how you can have multiple receivers for same sender.
regarding the receiver agreement, it determines which communication channel to use for the receiver.
for each receiver, it is unique, and you cannot configure more than one reciever agreement for the specified receiver
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.