on 06-13-2011 9:27 AM
Hi,
Can you help me out here? We are implementing the GTS 8.0.
Today i have added 3 Business partners to SPL List manually. These 3 Business partners exists in the ECC system with Same Name and Address.
After adding these business partners to SPL List,
i have done the following in SAP Compliance Management -> Sanctioned Party List Screening -> Master data
01) Reset Buffer
02) Generate Comparison Terms for Sanctioned Party Lists
03) Aggregate Comparison Terms for Sanctioned Party Lists &
04) Generate Comparison Terms for Business Partners
After doing the above, i have also executed the SAP Compliance Management -> Sanctioned Party List Screening -> Logistics
01) Check Business Partner Addresses (Batch) under Periodic screening.
02) Check Business Partner Addresses (Batch) against Updates Sanctioned Party Lists
Then i created sales order in ECC for one of the business partner who is in SPL List. The order doesn't go on Block and the message it displayed in Log is "Partner's address not found in any sanctioned party list", but infact one of the business partner name and address is in the SPL.
I tried with different checking programs under Sanctioned Party List screening, but couldn't able to achieve the desired results.
I'm using SAP delivered Standard Comparison procedure "SPLUS - Sanctioned Party List Screening - US Regulations"
For Name, i'm using Minimal Similarity for Search Term "80.00 %" and Search Term Origin " 2-Basis for Comparison Parellel from Sanct. Party List / Address"
I'm not sure what steps need to be done here to get this partner blocked
Regards,
Pradeep Maddi
Thanks Marc and Michael for the information. This issue has resolved. What i have done is
I again executed the following after updating the Sanctioned Party List
01) Reset Buffer
02) Generate Comparison Terms for Sanctioned Party Lists
03) Aggregate Comparison Terms for Sanctioned Party Lists &
04) Generate Comparison Terms for Business Partners
After doing the above, i have also executed the SAP Compliance Management -> Sanctioned Party List Screening -> Logistics
01) Check Business Partner Addresses (Batch) against Updates Sanctioned Party Lists
After this i rechecked all the export documents and found that screening has done against the SPL List.
Once again thanks for the information you provided.
Regards,
Pradeep Maddi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
There could be multiple issues, but my first guess would be, that the List you have enterred the Entries to does not get screened. Did you assign the list on which you added the partners to your SPL Legal Regulation SPLUS? Or in other words, when you do the screening against that SPL Legal regulation in dialog mode, does the Partner pop up as a hit?
The Other issue could be that your Legal regulation does not get activated. In your customizing, what is the departure country that activates your legal regulation? is that the same one as the one that activates your Legal regulation?
What I would suggest is that you do a simulation using transaction /SAPSLL/SPL_CHSS2 and screen your BP's and see if they get hit first, then do a simulation using transaction /SAPSLL/SIM_EXP_EXT and see if in the Log your Legal regulation gets triggered.
If you cant find the error, keep me posted on the log results and I'll tell you what's up.
Regards,
Marc
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
As Pradeep, as Marc says, the issue here is not at the time of document creation. At this point the system will only do a status check of the orders corresponding BPs, so unless a previous BP screening job has blocked these then the document will not be blocked. Its irrelevant that "one of the business partner name and address is in the SPL" because screening only occurs when you manually change an address element in the feeder system
Simulation of exact SPL details in /SAPSLL/SPL_CHSS3 would be a good place to start testing why the SPL entities were not considered at screening
User | Count |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.