Reasons not to implement ERM
We are in the process of evaluating whether to implement ERM or not.
It seems to be common knowledge that ERM is not as frequently implemented and not as mature as the other three components of Access Control.
What are, in your view, the most critical pain points of ERM 5.3 SP15 that made you or your customer choose not to implement it or a predecessor version (please mention the version/SP number)?
In particular, which problems have you experienced using ERM as the role source for CUP?
Thanks and regards
We checked it at AC5.3 Patch 8.2 and Patch 15. It is still not bug free, hence it is difficult to say whether the role generated in backend is exactly the same you wanted it to be.
It is better if you wait for ERM 10.0, I hope it will work better than AC5.3.