on 05-25-2011 6:57 PM
We use cross-company posting between company code 1000 and 9000. The cross-company documents in company 9000 show trading partner 1000, which is correct, however the same cross-company posting document on company 1000 shows itself, 1000, as its trading partner. Does anyone know what might be causing this? Thanks!
Hi, check sm30, table V_001_Y, seems 1000 maintained for CC 1000 and 9000
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Are you using AR/AP for doing cross company?
If yes, then check out the value in Trading partner field in the customer and vendor masters in company code 9000 and 1000.
I think there is some incorrect master data maintenance.
Regards,
Vishal.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello, no we are not using AR/AP specifically, only indirectly. I did go into the vendor/customer maintenance, though, to double check if the trading partner field was populated in any vendor/cust numbers for the company and subs, but there were none, so don't seem to be the issue. The trading partner is automatically populated as part of the cross-company posting. For example if we want to pass expenses from 1000 to 9000, we debit company 9000's expense GL and credit company 1000's expense GL, then post the cross-company transaction. It populates offsetting values in I/C AR in 1000 with trading partner 1000, and values in I/C AP in 900 with trading partner 1000. So all trading partners in the entire JE are 1000, rather than offsetting trading partners netting to zero. Any thoughts how to find the problem?
User | Count |
---|---|
96 | |
10 | |
9 | |
6 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.