05-21-2011 4:14 PM
I have a request from buyers , because they want to see checks information (FCH2) when I run SU53 I can see that they need object F_PAYR_BUK with activity 03.
Is there a problem if I gave them this authorization, that they can edit or modify in some way checks or related payment process?
Thank you.
Carlos
05-22-2011 5:23 AM
Hi Carlos,
No they will not be able to edit or modify the checks or related payment process since the SU53 says they are missing authorization for object F_PAYR_BUK with activity 03. Activity 03 gives only display access and no edit/modify access.
Hope this Helps.
Thanks.
05-22-2011 5:23 AM
Hi Carlos,
No they will not be able to edit or modify the checks or related payment process since the SU53 says they are missing authorization for object F_PAYR_BUK with activity 03. Activity 03 gives only display access and no edit/modify access.
Hope this Helps.
Thanks.
05-22-2011 10:50 PM
Hi Carlos
An unusual request for an MM user - what do they gain by accessing this transaction and why do they need it? One little transaction opens the ways for lots 'extra ones' unless you want to build a role per transaction...
Cheers
David
05-23-2011 3:07 PM
Hi Carlos,
Technically the object F_PAYR_BUK with 03 & $BUKRS only providesd display access to view checks. So it should not be an issue.. However from a security standpoint we can try to keep away such requirements as much as we can for the following reasons.
1. The Object F_PAYR_BUK is the prime auth check for most of the check maintenance tcodes including FCH4, FCH5 etc..
2. The same object is checked for FCH1 which provides bank account number details for payments which in some of the clients is confidential data.
3. Ideally all check maintenance tcodes fall under the purview of FI-AP & FI-TR areas based on the organisation. So opening up these tcodes to MM will have to be justified accordingly...
4. An cross pollination for whatsoever reason can bring in the risk which needs to be monitored continuously... Hence some monitoring effort has to be involved to make sure the objects are in display mode only for all buyers...
Hope these inputs help.
Regards,
Sri
05-23-2011 5:54 PM
Althought it seems no to be a problem, I will leave things working as standard, even if buyer have to call to check on payments to the suppliers.
Regards,
Thank you.
Carlos