cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

one sender and many receivers which best option can anybody

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi

to all

i have one sender and many receivers for ex : receivers are oracle ,sybase , ect .... which is best method to do can anybody pls

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Venu..

If your scenario is simple one file to multiple source then use multi mapping sans BPM. This is the best possible approach.

But, if the scenario is more complex then u must use BPM. For ex: if u have to wait for multiple files from same source and then merge them and send to different targets; if the scenario is sync-async etc. no name a few.

Please find out the complete scenario and then you might be able to decide whether to use BPM or not.

Cheers,

Souvik

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi

thanks for u help

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Venu,

as you mentioned.. the scenario is one sender and multiple receiver..

the case is that as Raj have mentioned there is possibility of MultiMapping. but the other things you need to consider are as follows:

scenario is one sender and many receiver: Do you mean to say ones interface trigger you want to send this to multiple receiver system or do you want to send this to one of your multiple receiver..

if you want to send this to one of receiver.. then just condition based receiver determination will be ok..but in case if you want to send this to all multiple receiver then as suggested go for multi mapping..

Thanks,

Bhupesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi

Thanks for u r help i think ur is best exampling

rajasekhar_reddy14
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Multi Mapping with out BPM right option,just simple search in sdn will give many links how to go ahead..

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi

raj

thaks for u help