on 04-01-2011 12:34 PM
Hi,
My client is facing problems in creating return order.
In returns orderwith out reference, he is putting sold to partty, return reason, material, quantity.
He in entering plant and storage location manually.In customizing, I've checked the storage locations assigned to the plant 1000
The storage locations are 1101,1121,1111,1141.
When He is entering storage locations 1101 or 1121, there is no error.
But when he is entering 1111, 1141 for the same plant, the system is showing error "check storage location"
I just want to know what should be the reason behind this and if it can be rectified, then how?
But when he is entering 1111, 1141 for the same
plant, the system is showing error
Has the above storage locations maintained in OVL3 ??
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi
well i cant say exactly without seeing the problem but you should check that whether storage location is assigned to plant or not , for that either you can use spro or use t-code ox09 to find it and if you maintain warehouse than it should be maintained also there.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ranjan,
Can you be more clear on your question.
What is the error message you are getting and why do you want to create the returns without reference?
Regards,
Rohan Gudavalli
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The client wants to create return order with out reference. And he wants to enter the plant and the respective storage location manually.
The storage locations which are allowed are coming in the F4 list and when he is selecting 1111 or 1141, the error is appearing " check storage location" where as in the rest of the storage locations, the order is getting saved with out errors.
He wants to enter the above said storage locations also but since the system is showing error, he is not able to do the same.
I just want to know the reason behind the same and if it can be rectified, then how...
Regards,
Pavi Ranjan
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.