BPM - s/a Bridge.

[Former Member]

Hi guys,

I want to do an s/a bridge, but a little bit different:

I have a sender interface that sends a message to BPM, the s/a bridge receives this message and send it to an SAP IS-U asynchronously. I don’t need to wait from response back, so I want to ignore (delete) the s/a bridge receiver step that receives this response. After BPM send the message to IS-U, I would like to put another send step that does an access to a data base table that returns a code (this access is synchronous). Is it possible doing something like this?

Scenario:

Receive sync -> send IS-U -> send DB -> Send response from DB sync.

To clarifying: I started with a sync process that become async, ignore the async response from the IS-U and do a sync access to a data base table that returns a code that I use as response in close of s/a bridge, instead of async response from IS-U.

Anyone knows if is possible? Makes sense?

Thanks in advance,

Ricardo.

Message was edited by: Ricardo Quintino

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Ricardo,

This is perfectly possible...

You would have

1. sync message interface(Receive step),

2. async message interface for the async send step, and 3. another sync message interface for the syncronous call to JDBC....

Your steps would be as follows....

1. Receive(open S/A bridge)...the message recieved is of

the i/p of the 1st sync message interface

2. Send Async(you would have a mapping in between if

reqd., using the asyn interface). Since this is ASYNC

and there is no subsequent receive step with

correlation, the response for this call will not be

considered by the BPM.

3. Send Sync to DB(using the 2nd Sync interface- mapping

to be done if required). This step will have a request

and a response message.

4. Send step - close S/A bridge, send the response back

(the response from the previous message or a mapped

message from the response )

Thanks,

Renjith

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Renjith,

I followed your suggestions and it’s working ;o)

Thanks a lot and points rewarded.

Ricardo.