on 03-21-2011 5:38 PM
Hello all,
We are facing an issue with BOP. We use the backorder processing in order to confirm the sales orders quantity. We have a sales order schedule line that was completely confirmed - quantity = 150 pieces. So this schedule line was changed to 100 pieces. As we disabled VA02 ATP, the confirmed quantity remained with 150 pieces. In other words, the confirmed quantity became greater than order quantity.
We thought that BOP process would correct this situation, reducing the confirmed quantity, but it doesnu2019t occur. The BOP result shows that nothing was change.
Is it possible to change this behavior?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Januario Faria
Rishi,
We use check against Request.
Ok. Thank you very much.
Regards.
Januario.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Rishi,
Request: 100
Confirmation, First version: 153
Thank you.
Januario.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Januario
In your BOP variant, on the 'Parameters Check' tab, do you check for requested dates/ quantities or Confirmed dates/ quantities.
If you check against Confirmation, try instead to check against Request.
Sorry, thats all I can think of. If it still doesnt work then as suggested by Michael, and if nobody else in the forum has any suggestions, raise an OSS message with SAP.
Rishi Menon
Hi Rishi.
Yes, the order is selected.
We can see it in transactions /SAPAPO/BOP_RESULT and /SAPAPO/BOP_WORKLIST.
Thank you.
Januario.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Michael,
We have already executed report /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 and run BOP with u201Ccancel confirmationu201D flag without success.
I didnu2019t understand your suggestion: u201Cto create a new SAP message to get a proper solutionu201D.
Could you give more details?
Thank you.
Januario.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Rishi Menon,
Thanks for you fast reply.
We use VA02 ATP only for some products that use MTS strategy u2013 ECC strategy 10. For most products that have strategy u201CPlanning with final assemblyu201D we canu2019t confirm any quantities before our production planning and control team (PPC) analyze the sales orders. To implement it, we have created a customized scenario with features below:
1. We created a Z delivery block;
2. All sales orders are created with this delivery block and it should not be confirmed before the PPC team analyze them. Because of that, we disabled the VA01/VA02 ATP;
3. The PPC team analyzes all new sales orders and they can change the delivery date. It depends on our production capacity and material's lead time, for example;
4. After this analysis, the delivery block is removed.
5. The ATP check is performed by BOP in background for all sales orders without delivery block.
With this scenario the BOP process works fine for almost totality of sales orders. We are facing problems only with this issue, when confirmed quantity is greater than order quantity.
Thank you.
Januario.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Januario,
In that case I would first execute the report /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 to check the consistency of the data before running BOP.
Another option would be the execution of an BOP run to unconfirm your orders (you can use the "cancel confirmation flag") first and afterwards execute a "normal" BOP to reconfirm all orders.
But usually BOP should be able to fix such overconfirmation situations. Maybe you have to create a new SAP message to get a proper solution of your issue.
best regards,
Michael
Januario
For BOP to work correctly, it must have the updated Sales Order information. So my guess is that since the VA02 ATP check is not performed, ATP relevant sales order details are not updated in APO.
What is the business reason for disabling the ATP check during VA02 ?
Rishi Menon
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.