Past due PurRqs are getting deleted in APO but not getting deletd in R3

[Private_Member_738444]

Hi folks,

We have a daily job, which runs at 18:00 hrs in the evening everyday in the APO Production System.The job is to delete all past due Purchase Requisitions for last 2 years (job & variant details are mentioned below) All the past due PurRqs are getting deleted from APO, which we have cross-cheked in RRP3 view many times.

However the same is not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end- user is getting confused & hassled by this list of old PurRqs which is visible in R3 through MD04 t-code.

Please suggest remedial/corrective actions to get this issue sorted.

The job details for the deletion of past purchase requisitions.

The job is run with the following variant details:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ABAP Program name :/SAPAPO/RLCDELETE

VARIANT Details

Select Object-> By Categories ->Category = AG (PurRqs in R3)

Manual Selection-> Version =000; Product = (blank); Location = List ofall locations;

Fixed Order (ticked)

Period = 14.03.2009 to 14.03.2011 {All PurRqs in these period shouldget deleted in APO as well as R3}

Settings-> Delete Transaction Data ->In R3 & APO (ticked)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Past due PurRqs are not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end-user is getting confused & hassled resulting in loss of productive time & generation of erroneous planning which is negatively impacting Business.

Pls suggest some remedy for this.

MMTIA

Kumar

Edited by: Blue Lotus on Mar 14, 2011 5:51 PM

[Former Member]

Hi,

After completion of RLCDEL job, setup a new of C5 (Send job) for the same selection of products and location.

Thanks

Venkat

[aparna_ranganathan]

Do you run the CCR on a daily basis. If so do you see the "reqs missing in R/3" in the CCR ?

Also what is your transfer setting ? Meaning the transfer from APO to R/3 configuration - is it immediate or change pointer based ? check that also

Thanks

Aparna