test configuration in ID

[Former Member]

Dear experts,

the IR and ID objects are renamed and configured . which is the better approach for testing the changes?

what are the differences between the test configuration in ID and the test from RWB ?

are there any cases which cannot be tested in test configuration in ID but could be done in RWB and vice versa ?

how do we test the scenarios with attachments from RWB or from test configuration in ID ..

Thanks,

Aju

[baskar_gopalakrishnan2]

>>what are the differences between the test configuration in ID and the test from RWB ?

Test configuration in ID will be helpful to test your configuration objects. It will make sure you associate properly cc to the sender and receiver agreement, configured right Reciever determination and Interface determination for that interface or scenario.

Test from RWB; Here basically you do payload testing. You can perfom only mapping test. You cannot do more than that.

This is basically design time test.

>>are there any cases which cannot be tested in test configuration in ID but could be done in RWB and vice versa ?

Yep, mapping test for the payload cannot be performed in test configuration.

>>how do we test the scenarios with attachments from RWB or from test configuration in ID ..

Attachment: Mail adapter has attachments. You cannot test both in RWB or test configuration. You need only end to end runtime test.

If you use java mapping that has 15 libaries files attached to that jar, you can test java mapping using RWB itself.

Hope I answered your question

[Former Member]

Hi,

In ID using test configuration we provide sender and receiver and does the testing to checking the configuration is proper or not...

but for entire scenario testing including payload testing we use RWB...

(this can send the message as if the sender system is going to send the message...) and can determine the receiver unlike ID test configuration..

HTH

Rajesh