on 02-23-2011 7:37 PM
Hello everyone
I am currently having some issues during the ATP in Sales Order in SD.
We are using Check Group 02 - A (Sales Order) with the following settings:
Stock Overview --- *all are unchecked*
Relenishment Lead Time -- *"Check without RLT" is checked*
Storage Location Inspection -- unchecked
In/Outward Movement --- the following are checked
Inc. Purchase Orders
Include Reservations
Include Sales Order req.
Include Deliveries
Rest all is unchecked
Now on a high level, what this does is that hard allocates the required Order Qty to the Sales Order if stock is available.
e.g. Material XYZ has 100 EA unrestricted stock
Order for 10 EA ... is allocated 10EA
Now if a second order comes in for 100EA .. it will allocate only 90EA
Now I was able to test this successfully with a newly created material in our development system.
Later I rejected all the Orders that I had created for this material in ECC.
Thus now MD04 for that material displayed no requirement.
Now again when I tried placing an order for this material ... it wouldn't confirm.
When I check the Availability Overview from the Sales Order, it shows the following details
Material -- XYZ
Plant - WXYZ
Total Display
Receipts - 100
Issues -- 300 Confirmed Issues - 100
ATP Situation
Date, MRP elm., MRP element Data, Rec./reqd qty , Confirmed , Cum. ATP
02/23/2011 , Stock , BLANK , 100, BLANK , BLANK
02/23/2011 , SimReq , Simulated Requirement , (10-) , BLANK , 0
02/24/2011 , CusOrd , Totals record , (300 -) , 100 , 0
02/23/2011 , SLocSt , LOC1 , 0 , BLANK , 0
02/23/2011 , SLocSt , LOC2 , 100 , BLANK , 100
Note:
I have put the dashes to allign them correctly. Also (10-) means negative 10
Plant WXYZ has 2 locations viz. LOC1 & LOC2
Currrently the stock of 100 EA is in LOC2.
ALso LOC1 is responsible to issue the stock to deliveries.
Question:
Why would the ATP confirm 0 qty inspite of the Orders placed for it have been rejected.
Note this material was never ever used before in Sales Orders.
Any thoughts
Thanks
Vin
Edited by: vinit parkar on Feb 23, 2011 8:38 PM
Edited by: vinit parkar on Feb 23, 2011 8:44 PM
It looks there may be inconsistency in VBBE table. Hence run program SDRQCR21 in SA38 for that material and recheck.
Regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.