cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Remote client copy ended with errors

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

We have performed a remote client copy from ECS TO ECQ Server. The

remote client copy ended with errors. It copied 56827 of 56829 tables.

I am do not know what the other 2 missing tables are. I am attahing the

remote client copy log with this message. Please advise why the remote

client copy ended with errors. Also, please note that the exception

table for the remote client copy is K9RECQ2200002. Please advise why my

client copy ended with errors. Below are the last entires from the client copy log.

4 E5P201 "Client 285, Feature WWUIF": Transfer from the standard client

4 E5P201 "Client 285, Feature WWUMP": Transfer from the standard client

4 E5P201 "Client 285, Feature XMCDF": Transfer from the standard client

4 E5P201 "Client 285, Feature XMCGR": Transfer from the standard client

4 E5P201 "Client 285, Feature ZHL04": Transfer from the standard client

4 E5P201 "Client 285, Feature ZLSCH": Transfer from the standard client

4 E5P201 "Client 285, Feature ZVDTA": Transfer from the standard client

4 ETA114 Runtime " 4" seconds

3 ETA072 Exit program "RPUMKX00" successfully executed "17:02:07"

4 ETA114 Runtime " 1" seconds

3 ETA072 Exit program "RPUPRR00" successfully executed "17:02:08"

2WESO672 "No address for SAP user SAPCPIC"

3 ESO672 "Number of new SAPoffice users 0"

3 ESO672 "Number of users marked as deleted 0"

3 ESO672 "Records deleted in SOUD: 0"

3 ESO672 "Records deleted in SOUC: 0"

3 ESO672 "Records changed in SOUC: 0"

3 ESO672 "New records in SOUC: 0"

3 ESO672 "User without address assignment 1"

3 ESO672 "User - SO_KEY generated 0"

3 ESO672 "User - SO_KEY not generated 0"

3 ESO672 "User w/o entry in table USRADR 1"

3 ESO672 "User with address assignment 568"

3 ESO672 "User w/o entry in USR21 0"

3 ESO672 "User with person group <> BC01 0"

3 ESO672 "User with invalid address 0"

3 ESO672 "User with default ADCP-SO_KEY 0"

3 ESO672 "User - SO_KEY generated subsequently 0"

3 ESO672 "User - SO_KEY updated 0"

3 ESO672 "User - address not changed 568"

3 ESO672 "User w/o where-used list 0"

4 ETA114 Runtime " 8" seconds

3 ETA072 Exit program "RSSOUSCO_FOR_CC" successfully executed "17:02:17"

4 ETA114 Runtime " 0" seconds

3 ETA072 Exit program "SFW_ADD_SWITCH_STATES" successfully executed "17:02:19"

4 ETA114 Runtime " 0" seconds

3 ETA072 Exit program "SXMB_CC_IS_CHECK" successfully executed "17:02:20"

3 ETA072 Exit program "USERBUF_RESET" successfully executed "17:02:20"

1 ETA357 Selected tables : " 56,829"

1 ETA296 " 1" tables in exception list

1 ETA298 Copied data in kBytes : " 131,425,827"

1 ETA299 Deleted data in kBytes : " 55"

1 ETA146 Program ended with error or warning, return code: "F"

1 ETA027 Runtime (seconds) : " 63,956"

1 ETA152 End of processing: "17:02:20"

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Tareq,

Have you run a simulation copy before the acutal run?

If not the next step would be to verify with the ABAPer's what this table is related to and if this table is not related to any other table , I strongly feel you can ignore this error and discuss on how to copy the failed table. also see why the certain table failed to copy.

Former Member
0 Kudos

When i check RFC system comparison" in SCC9 tcode, i get a lot of table dictionary differences because our production system is very different from our Quality. However, the client copy proceeded regardless.

Former Member
0 Kudos

I have opened up an OSS message with SAP and below is what they had to say. Please note that there was no interruption with Client

copy.

According to the log the 2 tables impacted would be CE1US10

and FAGLFLEXA. Please check if these tables exist in your copies version

Also there was an error

2 ETA231 RFC error. System: "ECSCLNT300" Table: "CE1US10" RC: "10"

2 ETA532 "Time limit exceeded." " "

Was there an interruption during the copy process?

-


4 ETA346 "BCST_SR :"" 442417 0 0 COPY"" 463155 1290 07:29:35"

4 ETA346 "BCST_SU :"" 809 0 0 COPY"" 36 1 07:29:36"

4 ETA346 "BD001 :"" 0 0 0 COPY"" 0 1 07:29:37"

4 ETA346 "BDAUDQUEUE :"" 0 0 0 COPY"" 0 1 07:29:38"

4 ETA346 "BDAUDSTATE :"" 0 0 0 COPY"" 0 1 07:29:39"

2 ETA231 RFC error. System: "ECSCLNT300" Table: "CE1US10" RC: "10"

2 ETA532 "Time limit exceeded." " "

4 ETA346 "CE21010 :"" 0 0 0 COPY"" 0 7 07:38:36"

4 ETA346 "CE2E_B1 :"" 0 0 0 COPY"" 0 1 07:38:37"

4 ETA346 "CE2S001 :"" 0 0 0 COPY"" 0 1 07:38:38"

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

You can check both the repository by clicking on "RFC system comparison" in SCC9 tcode.

Thanks,

Subrata