on 02-10-2011 2:36 PM
In MM-SUS
We are able to map, PO(ECC) > PO Display (SUS)> PO Response(SUS) > ASN(SUS) > IBD (ECC) > GR with Reference to IBD (ECC) > GR Display(SUS).
In some cases we also need,
We are able to map, PO(ECC) > PO Display (SUS)> PO Response(SUS) u2026u2026. GR with reference to PO (ECC) > GR Display(SUS).
Will it be possible? If so, what should be the message type in ALE (WE20)? What should be the message type for Inventory Management Document (i.e. GR).
Ganapathi
Hi Ganapathy,
For vendors with whom you need to carry out the procurement cycle without ASN, just remove the 'Confirmation Control Key' indicator in the vendor master. (001)
Thus these vendors will not have to create an ASN and you can create a GR with reference to PO.
Regards,
Nikhil
Edited by: Nikhil RGupta on Feb 10, 2011 6:58 PM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Stephane Bailleul and Nikhil R Gupta,
Thanks for the response.
This is fine. But the questions are,
1. In ECC, when we do the GR with reference to PO what is the message type and IDOC?
2. What is the output type to define in TCode NACE, to trigger IDOC when we do the GR with reference to PO?
Ganapathi
In the MM SUS scenario you are not obliged to have an ASN
I doesn't change your setting on WE20,the asn depends on your agreement with the vendor, on SUS some will have to do the ASN whereas someothers don't need to do it .
So the interface between ECC and SUS don't need to be change because of the vendor.
Whereas the role of your vendor on SUS can include or not the ASN possibilities;
I hope it helps you
Cheers
Stephane
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.