on 02-08-2011 1:05 AM
Hi Guys,
We are trying to connect the data services(DQ) with SAP PI through SOAP adapter. I provided the wsdl file to data services team and they are trying to send messages to PI. Looks like the messages are showing successful in there system, but not showing up in PI system.
I tried the same file using xmlspy and PI receiving the messages from XMLSPY. We are wondering whats going wrong?
Any idea about this data services system? Is there any other better way to receive messages to PI apart from webservices?
PS: Connection is working fine from PI to DQ thorugh SOAP adapter.
Thanks
Deepthi.
answered
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Deepthi,
>>but not showing up in PI system.
What is the status of the Sender Adapter ?
Cheers
Agasthuri
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>> cross check the WSDL file provided ..by chance are there two PI servers in your landscape ?
No. only one PI Server. We are trying in development system and no traffic as well. The messages are coming successfully if I send through XMLSPY and SOAPUI and from other third party systems.
>> also if possible ask them to check the wsdl url from their server in IE.. or ask them to PING to PI server..
we tried url in IE, it is correct. As soon as I enter in IE, it asks for Userid and password, once i enter, it shows the successfull message " Message Servlet is in Status OK".
From my side, everything looks fine. Not sure where it's going wrong.
>>>> We are trying to connect the data services(DQ) with SAP PI through SOAP adapter. I provided the wsdl file to data services team and they are trying to send messages to PI. Looks like the messages are showing successful in there system, but not showing up in PI system.
You are using soap sender adapter ... Hosting webservices and DQ team is able to access your webservice. Also using XMLSPY you are able to see pi messages.
If you are using advance adapter engine, Please check only in the RWB -> adapter engine.
If you are not using AAE, check in both SXMB_MONI and RWB for the wide range... Something problem with filter query in your checking...
Note since XMLSPY testing goes through Pi and able to monitor means you dont need another webservice client tool.
Solution:
use tcp monitor to monitor the soap message ... It is better option
/people/stefan.grube/blog/2007/03/29/troubleshooting-soap-http-and-mail-adapter-scenarios-with-tcpgateway
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi baskar,
>> You are using soap sender adapter ... Hosting webservices and DQ team is able to access your webservice. Also using XMLSPY you are able to see pi messages. //
I'm not receiving any messages from DQ. Looks like it is showing successful from there side, but im nor receiving any messages in PI server. With the same WSDL file i test with XMLSPY and able to receive the messages.
Hello,
Can you try testing the wsdl using SOAP UI and let us know of the results? Also, can you look in RWB message monitoring (adapter engine)?
Regards,
Mark
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>> You should check for firewalls in-between systems e.g firewall from DQ going to PI or firewall from your intranet going to PI.
No Firewall between the systems. All these systems are internal and we can ping these systems to talk each other.
Also I can send messages from PI to DQ successfully.
Any idea how to do the testing for incoming messages using XMLSPY or SOAPUI tools. So that we can send messages to those tools to check the settings are are fine at DQ system. ?
Hi Guys,
The scenario is working if i use the Asycn/Sync method. I'm receiving the response message from DQ for Sycnchronous request.
Still as per our requirement and for performance improvement, we want to handle it through Asycn method. I'm not sure whether it has any limitations in handling Asycn calls. Will update if I see any improvements.
Thanks
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.