on 01-27-2011 12:16 PM
Hi friends,
My ''receivables'' in FD33 is not matching with that of Fbl5n for one customer. I have an amount of 240(over payment by the customer referencing the invoice doc) with DZ doc type sitting in FBL5n which is not showing up in fd33 for one customer.
The config of the company code and credit control area is correct. moreover i have selected the correct company codes and credit control area for both t-codes.
i have no open orders, deliveries, etc .
Aany suggestions?
Thanks,
Anand
Edited by: Anand Mathur on Jan 27, 2011 1:19 PM
hi,
this is to inform you that,
why should this two INFORMATIONS SHOULD be equal.
there might be some values which might not considered for FD33 and FBL5N.
plese find out that.
i also think so that will not equal at any cost.
balajia
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Anand,
Recently i faced similar error which was corrected using report RVKRED77 which i mentioned in my previous post.
I think both the values in FBL5N and FD32 should be same.
I think it occurs due to update errors in infostructure S066 and S067.
You can go through Note 400311 and 716141 for more details.
Hope this helps
Regards
Mayank
Dear Anand,
Please run "RVKRED77 SD: Reorganization of credit data" report using SE38.
You can try RVKRED88 which is test run you check the results in RVKRED88 and then you run RVKRED77.
This will reorganize data of particular customer and will correct all the update errors.
Hope this resolves your Issue
Regards
Mayank
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Couple of quick Check points that you have to ensure are:
Whether you have activated the credit check at document header level?
Whether the item category is checked for credit check.
If above mentioned configuration is in place then search for the SAP note which will update the credit information correctly. For one of my client we have applied the note( sap note no is not offhand hence could not provide)
Hope this will help you.
Please revert back to forum if you have any doubts.
Thanks and Regards,
Atul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
110 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.