on 01-03-2011 7:26 PM
Hi Experts,
i have the following requirement:
For reporting purpose, I need to identify which SC / PO have been approved automatically because the requester spending limit was superior to the SC / PO total value.
How can I do this?
Can you give me some guindance?
Thanks in advance,
Francisco
I would use most the techniques mentioned above: reading the container, the frequency transaction. There is no straight-forward answer.
What you might want to do is to identify the difference between SC/PO that are approved automatically and those that are not in the workflow container (or in the SC/PO record itself). You can either write a report or better yet, export the data to a business objects (or BW) system and deal with it there.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
How is a SC/PO approved automatically? Is it a step done in the workflow? Do you have a fork that runs in parallel to send an item for approval and auto-approve on the other?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Please check SWI2_FREQ transaction meets your requirement or not.
Workitem Type: Workflow
Task Filter: WSXXXXXXXX for automatic approval workflow
Regards,
Masa
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Masa,
I need some extra guidance.
the system is using the same workflow for approving the SC /PO with or without spending limit: approval in n-steps. so I don't know how to retrive the information using the transaction you have mentioned.
I could compare the value of the SC / PO with the spending limit but the problem is that the spending limit is stored in table HRP5503 and it doens't keeps the history. So if the spending limit is changed I cannot compare the value of a SC /PO approved in the past with the current spending limit.
thanks in advance,
Francisco
User | Count |
---|---|
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.