Use of Logical System

[Former Member]

Hi GRC Experts:

I am currently defining my RAR landscape strategy. In the past, I have used logical systems for the same "type" of system. For example, we had 3 ECC environments so I created a logical system for the 3 ECC systems.

Now we have 1 ECC, 1 APO and 1 SRM system. Are there any benefits of setting up a logical system within this landscape? I would imagine there are some benefits with creating a logical system and assigning the BASIS risks to that system because the risks exist across the different environments. But are there any others?

Thank you,

Grace Rae

[Former Member]

I have a query,,,

We need dash board with out BI or BO or DS... on ECC.

Please suggest

Regards

Sai

[Former Member]

Grace,

I will suggest you go with three different physical system.

Logical system is useful when you are defining same ruleset for say 5 ECC boxes.

regards,

Surpreet

[Former Member]

Hi Grace, Logical Systems would be an optimal design if you need to add more systems in the future to the GRC landscape to perform Risk analysis.

Logical System 1: ECC Logical System

All the ECC Physical Systems (PR1, PR2, etcu2026)

Function Authorizations to be uploaded are r3_function_actions and r3_function_permissions files which excludes the Basis Functions

Logical System 2: SRM Logical System

All the SRM physical Systems (PS1, PS2, etc...)

Function Authorizations to be uploaded are srm_function_actions and srm_function_permissions

Logical System 3: APO Logical System

All the APO physical Systems (PA1, PA2, etc...)

Function Authorizations to be uploaded are apo_function_actions and apo_function_permissions

Logical System 4: ALL Systems

All the physical systems (PR1, PR2, PS1, PS2, PA1, PA2....)

Function Authorizations to be uploaded are just the Basis Function Actions and permissions

Bugesh