on 11-15-2010 9:23 AM
Can we set-up in configuration such that a specific Billing type should not be relevant for retro-billing?
E.g. F2 - Invoice is relevant for Retro-bill.. but DR (referencing to the F2-invoice) is not.. by standard it is getting all invoices including its CM and DM referencing to it.
Best regards,
Hello Gemma
You control that aspect (Relevant to Retro Billing or not) by using order reason. Let me quote directly form help documentation:
To make the credit and debit memos and memo requests relevant for retroactive billing, you need to assign a type to the order reason as follows:
for primary documents, assign type 2
for secondary documents, assign type 1
for documents which are not relevant for retroactive billing, do not assign a type
You assign types to order reasons in Customizing for Sales and Distribution (choose Sales> Sales Documents-> Sales Document Header -
> Define order reasons).
So if you use an order reason Which is bank (i.e. which is not assigned 1 or 2) for the field 'Use of order reason for retro-billing
' in the credit memo request (Which then gets copied to credit memo), then that CM/DM will not be taken into consideration for Retro-Billing processing. Although the system does not take documents with other order reasons into account, it displays them in the list in another color.
See this link:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/ff/b9abf4eaf411d1954800a0c9306667/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Can you check OSS Note 427102 - Incorrectly, billing document can be retro-billed would help?
Regards
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.