Pricing procedure (Jurisdiction based)

[Former Member]

Dear Experts,

We are setting up the pricing procedure for USA with Jurisdiction code and the pricing procedure is YBUS02. We created one Tax code for all Jurisdiction codes and while creating the Tax code.. we maintained the Tax rate as "100%" for JR1, JR2, JR3 and JR4. And then maintained the exact tax rate in VK19 for each Jurisdiction codes such as CA0010000 = 5%, CA0011000 = 4%, CA0012000 = 3%. But after maintaining the tax rate in VK19, the Tax rates are getting changed in FTXP instead of 100%.

Could you please confirm whether this is right procedure or what could be the reason for getting changed in FTXP.

Thank you.

Regards,

Mani

[Former Member]

HI Mani,

Please review your process like the follow recommendation:

1) The tax jurisdiction conditions (JR1,..., JR4) have to be maintained

with condition type (KNTYP) '1', '2', '3', '4' in SD and on FI side.

Look also at FI side:

SPRO:

-> Financial Accounting

-> Financial Accounting Global Settings

-> Tax on Sales/Purchases

-> Basic Settings

-> Check Calculation Procedure

-> Define Condition Types

Please maintain the correct entries on FI side and the deepest

level for tax jurisdictions (BSET-TXJDP) will be filled correctly.

2) The sequence of the pricing procedure is very important.

A statistical condition should never be included into the tax base.

Furthermore the FROM-TO step of the tax conditions has to be

referenced to the last subtotal line.

Otherwise the tax code will not be transfered corretly and the

tax base would be incorrect.

The tax conditions JR1, JR2, JR3 and JR4 need to have the manual

flag in the pricing procedure (T683S-KAUTO). Otherwise two condition

types would be available in the document. For your reference you

could use the standard pricing procedure RVAJUS.

The account keys should be adjusted to the ones that were maintained

in FI, transaction FTXP.

I hope it can help you to solve the issue.

Regards

Ruy Castro