JDBC Receiver Channel

[Former Member]

Hi,

We have four scenarious in ID which uses the same JDBC Receiver Channel.

My question is that when all this four scenarious get started at same time, it gets piled up in queue for processing rather than parallely processing.

Is it a good idea to have separate communication channel for each of these scenarious even though the configurations like db name etc is same.

P.S. Please note that the table name is coming from the payload.

I would like to know what sense does it make on using either of the approaches and does it make any difference by giving maximum concurrency on this.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Krish,

if you use only one or four communication channels depends on your requirements.

If you have a requirement for EOIO processing you need differnd communication channels if you want to avoid that one message blocks all other.

Also if you have a very high load on the communication channel it could make sense to use differnt communication channels.

In all other cases i would recommend to use only one communication channel for each source.

Regards,

Björn