cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Sales Returns with batch split.

Former Member
0 Kudos

12.10.10

Hi friends,

I have created a sales return against invoice with multiple batches for a BOM item. During returns the returns have created individual lines for each of the batch and the components are also available as per sales bom. The components are dependent on the main item and since the main items are in multiple lines when changes are done the components are not adjusted accordingly. Please advise how to solve this problem.

Regards,

Udaynath.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

reazuddin_md
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Not sure how the copy control maintained between Invoice - Returns order.

- How the components available in Returns order when creating wrt Invoice?

- Are you using main item level pricing or sub item pricing?

- which item is actually delivered / billed , ist main item or sub item?

If you create return order without any ref to invoice, any changes to main item will have impact on component also ( eg: qtty increase/decrease) - Assumption is that Return Order item category is activated for Batch determination & required batch determination related config settings @ item level is taken care)

Regards,

Reazuddin MD

Former Member
0 Kudos

12.10.2010

Reazuddin thanks for the reply. Yes this is a complex scenario.

Its the main matierial which is physically moved out from stock.

The billing and pricing is done at the component level, the main material as well as the components are available in the billing document.

The problem is with the returns against invoice. When the return order is maed it has the main material say with line 10 without batches and quantity.

The batches are copied with the quantity as line number 11,12 ...

So when the quantity is changed in the lines containing batches, the changes are not carried out in the components as the components are referring to line 10.

The issue is when there are multiple batches. Can you please advise on the scenario.

Regards,

Udaynath.