No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order

[Former Member]

Hello,

We have un serious problem : No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order

System : SAP ERP 6.0 /7.0 - EHP 4

Note 965633 was read.

1) First case: The purchase order 4510000673 does not reduce the funds reservation.

Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193 because all post of the PO charge the funds reservation 1200000193.But the consumption history of the funds reservation 1200000193 donu2019t show this consumption.

In table FMIOI, we do not have lines with amount type 0200 (reduction) but whe have the lines with the post of PO with amount type (0100). The Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193.

In table KBLP, the fields are :

Total amount (LC) - HWGES = 53.409,40

Amount used u2013 WTABB = 0,00

Reduction amount u2013 HWABB = 0,00

Open amount u2013 CWTFREE = 53.409,40

Reduced amount u2013 WTABG = 0,00

Reduced amount u2013HWABG = 0,00

To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.

2) Second case : Delete a item of a purchase order does not release the budget

The single item of the purchase order 4510000597 is deleted but in the display of consumption History of the funds reservation 1200000137, the amount of the purchase order is not to zero.

To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.

Somebody already had a similar problem ?

Thank you

Fabian

[iklovski · Accepted solution]

Hi Fabian,

If you are sure that there is no 0200 lines on EMF 1200000193 in FMIOI, that the PO (in EKKN) is assigned to this EMF and reconstruction programs of FMN4N/FMN5N do't help, then open OSS message.

Regards,

Eli

[Former Member]

I open OSS message.

[mar_novalbos]

Hello Fabian

There are two known notes dealing with missing update on reference Earmarked Funds, I am listing them for future references:

1376800 Earmarked funds: Incorrect open amount

1438487 RFFMRC20: Missing KBLE records are ignored

These notes correct some errors within the Standard.

However, in your scenario, problem has to do with an incorrect execution of a Commit work inside a customer user-exit. After elimination of this commit work, new Po's are working correctly.

Remaining task is the correction of old PO's. Manual correction via small changes with ME22N (for instance, adding a '.' to the line item text/s) will force the correct update and fix your database

If you agree, we can close this thread (?)

Kind regards

Mar

[Former Member]

The problem has to do with an incorrect execution of a Commit work inside a customer user-exit