Change "Entered_by" field in GR created from SRM Portal

[Former Member]

Hello,

I am new to SRM and I have a small issue that I do not know if it can be done and if so, how to do it and was wondering if you could help me with it. In the Company I work for orders and confirmations are done on SRM portal. This flows into backend system R/3 and creates POu2019s and Material documents.

When confirmations are created the name displayed on the GR/Service Entry Sheet in R/3 is 'saprfc' as for R/3 the document is created by a rfc conection (by the assigned rfc user in fact) when de IDOC is executed.

Is there a way to change this 'saprfc' user for the user who entered it via SRM?

I tried IEQCM_GOODS_MOVEMENT BADI in R/3 side. In the method GOODS_MVMNT_UPD I called a remote SRM client function that returns the creator user name and change it on CS_GOODSMVT_HEADER-PR_UNAME field but it didn't work.

Then I tried BADI BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW method FILL_PO_INTERFACE1 but it didn't work either.

Thank you for your time and help.

Kind Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

This is a simple logic you need to do in BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI (SRM)

Thanks!!

Bharath

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Bharath,

Thanks for your answer. I created an implementation on the SRM side for that BADI but I still get the same problem. CREATED_BY field has 'saprfc' user id.

My code would be:

 
METHOD if_ex_bbp_ecs_po_out_badi~bbp_b46b_po_outbound.

  cs_bapi_poheader-created_by = 'MYUSERID'.

ENDMETHOD.

Am I missing something?

Thanks & Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Still PO created by is RFC UserID ????

Thanks!!

Bharath

[former_member183819 · Accepted solution]

Note 761630 - WF-Batch in change documents

Reason and Prerequisites

There are processes in which changes to the document are implemented in the background task in the background (for example, by the workflow). In this case, the system user WF-BATCH is displayed in the document as the last 'Changed by'.

Solution

This is not a general error because the change history correctly displays changes made by the workfow, for example.

In some cases, it would make sense, from a business point of view, that the change history does not display the WF Batch but the user who triggered the workflow/background process (example: approval of a shopping cart by a manager). Due to the complexity of this development, which involves adjustments of all workflows and background processes, no solution can be provided in Releases SRM 4.0 and SRM 5.0. An advance correction is only possible for the special case when shopping carts are released (see Note 761293).

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Bharath,

Yes, PO still created with User id SAPRFC.

Thanks & Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Muthuraman,

Thanks for your reply. I'll check the note and with the business and let you know.

Thanks & Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

We use the same coding and its works perfectly for us..

Please verify the OSS note as muthu suggested if that also didn't fix the issue, lets think about some other options..

Thanks!!

Bharath

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Bharath,

Is there any type of configuration or customizing I must do in SRM for this BADI?

Thanks & Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

No, we don't need to do any config here.. My expectation is your PO should have created by User ID the one you pass from SRM..

Do you check whether your BADI Implementation is active in SRM.. If not, you need to do that first..

Thanks!!

Bharath

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Bharath,

It is active the implementation. I asked you about the configuration because as I am not familiar with SRM, maybe it is a module where BADIs should be on a special list or whatever....

Thanks & Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Bharath,

I am using SRM 5.0. Does the version have something to do?

Thanks & Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Yes it does matter, I am using SRM 7.0..

What is your ECC version??

Thanks!!

Bharath

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Bharath,

I have ECC v 6.0 and SRM v 5.00.

Thanks & Regards,

Ernesto

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Muthuraman,

It finally looks that you were right. This can't be done in SRM 5.0. Thanks for your help. Bharath, thanks too. Points have been awarded for you both.

Regards

Ernesto.