on 09-15-2010 9:56 AM
Hi Experts,
I have created the custom condition type and added those in the group 0100 & 01HD for contract in SRM with reference to ECC. When I save the contract with those condition types in both header & item level, it is getting saved. But once I open that contract in the display mode the condition saved in the header does not exist. Can any one tell me, what is the exact soluition for this?
Suitable answers will be rewared.
SRM 5.0 Extended classic scenario
ECC 6.0
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
Hi,
the issue has been resolved by this notes.
1368917 Contract item: Conditions get new condition guid
1297437 Header conditions are not displayed in contract
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Muthu,
I don't see any idoc in the backend. We are in the extended classic scenario and I have created the local contract.
As I stated earlier the header conditions are not exists in the GUI, even those are in table SAP019.
Any note to be applied for this?
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
ok. i understand you are not usig GOA and using local CONTRACT.
What is the status of the contract now. are discounts are not calcualted while creating PO?
create a new thread ..and mention it is a LOCAL contract.
leant that your header conditions are wiped out.sorry i confused you by GOA mapping.
as of i knew only SRM PO you will have all conditions types but when it goes to ECC it has only net price.
however let us trace why Header conditions are wiped out.
I am sure sap can help you.
add standard condition in the header .let us see if it is wiped .create a OSS message.
Can you use 01RH % only . lets see header is wiped out ?
please create a new thread , i spoiled your thread.
so you are telling that /1CN/CBPSAP016 and /1CN/ABPSAP016 table has header guid reference
Muthu
Hi Muthu,
Sorry for the delayed response.
No. It is not in the backend system.
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ok. Then I have done correctly. But I could not see any condition type(standard & custom) at header level as I said above. Any idea?
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Muthu, I could find the item level conditions as you told in BBP_PD as like as in GUI. The requirement is to create local condition types as like as ECC. Do I have to map it with ECC ones for this?
However, I still could not find the header conditions in both BBP_PD & GUI. Do you have any clue for this?
Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Pushparaj
in the above mentioned BADI
Maping SRM conditions with ECC conditions
Maping SRM conditions with ECC conditions to Header Level
Maping SRM conditions with ECC conditions to Item Level
if the conditions are same , you may not require to map.why we may map condition type since SRM and EC condition type are not similar.
Muthu
Hi, I just check with one of hte SAP standard header condition OR1H - Header diccount %, it is also not found in hte BBP_PD.
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
There are no conditions found under "conditions" in BBP_PD, even the item conditions(which are visible in GUI).
Muthu, I have created the local condition type as like as ECC. Do they also need to be mapped as you said?
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
As you mentioned earlier you can maintain the condition types in Contract, if it gets saved than it must appear for that OBJECT ID in T-Code BBP_PD.
And if it doesn't gets available in BBP_PD than I suggest you please confirm your pricing config or else on saving switch to debugging mode & see where the currency values are getting initial again.
Sandip
Hi
you may need to map the condition in this BADI
upon equal ECC conditions BADI BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE
646903 Global outline agreement: Tips and tricks
for ex.
IF lwa_ct_be_cnd_ct-cond_type EQ lc_01ct.
lwa_ct_be_cnd_ct-cond_type = lc_pb00.
like wise you have to map your custom SRM condition type to ECC condition type whatever is equivalent there
Muthu
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
When you said the conditions were getting saved, did you verify through transaction BBP_PD and see those price conditions there?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No. I have maintained different condition in both item and header as below. But the header condition is not there, once I open it back.
Header - header discount 2%
item1 absoute discount 2 EUR
item2 absoute discount 2 EUR
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
As a standard practice we must maintain condition types either at header or item level.If we maintain at same condition type in both level system picks up the item level price & maintains same in DB.
Reference to my perception your system is behaving as required.
Else please do explain in what business process you need to maintain same condition type at two different level?
Sandip
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.