on 09-13-2010 7:59 PM
Hi Gurus,
When we creating a STO to sub contractor vendor ( in the delivery address tab we are entering the vendor # and activating the SC vendor check box)we are getting the error message as "T161W: Vendor+subcontracting vendor not allowed for 2-step stock transfer".
Message no: MEPO140
Note:
The STO is creating with out error in ECC 5.0 for the above scenario but when i'm trying the same in ECC 6.0 in another system I'm getting this error, Can any one please advice.
Thanks in advance,
Sai
If we corrected the movement type in the program, How can we handle the stock in transit?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This error message seems to be triggered from program LMEPOF23:
* OM EhP 604
*-- Prüfen, ob Ein-Schritt-Umlagerung für LB (BWART 64A)
* erlaubt ist und ob Serialnummern vorliegen
IF cl_ops_switch_check=>mm_om1_sfws_sc( ) = abap_true. "OMA
IF t161w-uml1s IS INITIAL
AND ekpo-pstyp EQ cl_mmpur_constants=>pstyp_7 "STO
AND NOT ekpo-emlif IS INITIAL
AND NOT ekpo-lblkz IS INITIAL.
MESSAGE e140(mepo). "#EC *
ELSEIF t161w-uml1s IS NOT INITIAL
AND ekpo-pstyp EQ cl_mmpur_constants=>pstyp_7 "STO
AND ekpo-bstyp EQ cl_mmpur_constants=>bstyp_f
AND NOT ekpo-anzsn IS INITIAL.
MESSAGE e141(mepo). "#EC *
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
*/OM EhP 604
From the comment you can see that it is related to EhP 604.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You said:
The STO is creating with out error in ECC 5.0 for the above scenario but when i'm trying the same in ECC 6.0 in another system I'm getting this error, Can any one please advice.
I replied:
From the comment you can see that it is related to EhP 604
What I'm saying:
It seems the check was implemented by EhP 604 (ECC6.04) so this check was not present in ECC5.0. In the system you receive the error the EhP is already implemented otherwise you would not get the error message.
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.