cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

T161W: Vendor+subcontracting vendor not allowed for 2-step stock transfer

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Gurus,

When we creating a STO to sub contractor vendor ( in the delivery address tab we are entering the vendor # and activating the SC vendor check box)we are getting the error message as "T161W: Vendor+subcontracting vendor not allowed for 2-step stock transfer".

Message no: MEPO140

Note:

The STO is creating with out error in ECC 5.0 for the above scenario but when i'm trying the same in ECC 6.0 in another system I'm getting this error, Can any one please advice.

Thanks in advance,

Sai

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

If we corrected the movement type in the program, How can we handle the stock in transit?

csaba_szommer
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

This error message seems to be triggered from program LMEPOF23:


* OM EhP 604
*-- Prüfen, ob Ein-Schritt-Umlagerung für LB (BWART 64A)
* erlaubt ist und ob Serialnummern vorliegen
  IF cl_ops_switch_check=>mm_om1_sfws_sc( ) = abap_true.      "OMA
    IF t161w-uml1s IS INITIAL
      AND ekpo-pstyp EQ cl_mmpur_constants=>pstyp_7 "STO
      AND NOT ekpo-emlif IS INITIAL
      AND NOT ekpo-lblkz IS INITIAL.
      MESSAGE e140(mepo).                                   "#EC *
    ELSEIF t161w-uml1s IS NOT INITIAL
      AND ekpo-pstyp EQ cl_mmpur_constants=>pstyp_7 "STO
      AND ekpo-bstyp EQ cl_mmpur_constants=>bstyp_f
      AND NOT ekpo-anzsn IS INITIAL.
      MESSAGE e141(mepo).                                   "#EC *
    ENDIF.
  ENDIF.
*/OM EhP 604

From the comment you can see that it is related to EhP 604.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks for your valuable reply.

So are you suggesting to implement the enhancement pacakge.

Please adivce.

Thanks,

Sai

csaba_szommer
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

You said:

The STO is creating with out error in ECC 5.0 for the above scenario but when i'm trying the same in ECC 6.0 in another system I'm getting this error, Can any one please advice.

I replied:

From the comment you can see that it is related to EhP 604

What I'm saying:

It seems the check was implemented by EhP 604 (ECC6.04) so this check was not present in ECC5.0. In the system you receive the error the EhP is already implemented otherwise you would not get the error message.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks for your Reply, I understood now.

Thanks,

Sai

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

With the enhancement pack, SAP is forcing us to use a new movement type when transferring stock from plant to plant with direct ship to a subcontractor. Changing movement types is not a problem however weu2019re losing in transit visibility if we do so.

Please advice.

Thanks,

Sai

0 Kudos

Hi,

We are in ECC6.0 EHP3.

We have the same scenario with our client and when we create the STO , we the field "LBLKZ-Subcontracting vendor" is hidden in the Delivery address tab.

Can you please advise how we can proceed with .

Gobinathan G